Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc

Filing 64

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 63 Stipulation Re Enlarge Time to Oppose 59 MOTION to Dismiss. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

PERKINS COIE LLP
DAVID P. CHIAPPETTA, State Bar No. 172099
[e-mail]
MARA BOUNDY, State Bar No. 287109
[e-mail]
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.344.7050
DAVID J. BURMAN, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
SHYLAH R. ALFONSO, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
DAVID S. STEELE, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, Washington 98101-3099
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 206.359.9000

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22

v.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION
CARE, INC.,
Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00941 HSG
STIPULATED REQUEST TO
ENLARGE TIME TO OPPOSE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS AND ORDER
[Civil L.R. 6-2]
Complaint Filed:

March 2, 2015

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 15-cv-00941 HSG

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

It is stipulated between Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) and Defendant
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (“J&J”) by their respective attorneys as follows:
1.

The parties previously stipulated to extend J&J’s deadline to answer or otherwise

respond to Costco’s complaint to April 17, 2015;
2.

On April 17, 2015, J&J filed a motion to dismiss Costco’s complaint under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6);

8

3.

J&J noticed the motion for hearing before this Court on July 2, 2015;

9

4.

The parties now agree to extend Costco’s deadline to oppose J&J’s motion to May

10

29, 2015;

11

5.

12
13

The parties further agree that J&J’s reply brief in support of its motion is due on or

before June 12, 2015;
6.

Beyond previously stipulating to extend J&J’s time to respond to the complaint,

14

the parties have not otherwise requested extensions of any deadlines from this Court. Enlarging

15

Costco’s time to respond will not alter any existing deadlines or the current case schedule.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: April 24, 2015

PERKINS COIE LLP
By:

/s/ Shylah R. Alfonso
David J. Burman, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
Shylah R. Alfonso, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
David S. Steele, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, Washington 98101-3099
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 206.359.9000
David P. Chiappetta, State Bar No. 172099
[e-mail]
Mara Boundy, State Bar No. 287109
[e-mail]
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.344.7050

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
-1STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 15-cv-00941 HSG

1
2

DATED: April 24, 2015

PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP
By:

3
4
5
6

/s/ William F. Cavanaugh
William F. Cavanaugh, State Bar No. 133461
[e-mail]
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212.336.2222

Attorneys for Defendant,
JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE, INC.

7
8
9
10

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13
14
15
16

DATED: April 27, 2015
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 15-cv-00941 HSG
LEGAL125288543.2

1
ATTESTATION

2
3

I, Shylah R. Alfonso, do hereby declare pursuant to Civil L.R. 5(i)(3) that concurrence in

4

the filing of the foregoing document has been obtained from Defendant’s counsel, William F.

5

Cavanaugh, on this 24th day of April, 2015.

6
/s/ Shylah R. Alfonso
Shylah R. Alfonso

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 15-cv-00941 HSG
LEGAL125288543.2