Austin v. The County of Alameda et al

Filing 95

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 94 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Notice of Settlement and Joint Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order to Reset Case Management Conference filed by Jamal Austin. Case Management Statement due by 4/20/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/27/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/28/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017)

Download PDF
6 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Melanie M. Blunschi (Bar No. 234264) Anna E. Berces (Bar No. 287548) Morgan Whitworth (Bar No. 304907) melanie.blunschi@lw.com anna.berces@lw.com morgan.whitworth@lw.com 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jamal Austin 1 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 JAMAL AUSTIN, 12 Case No.: 3:15-cv-00942-EMC Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; JOINT STIP. REQ. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET CMC Case No.: 3:15-cv-00942-EMC TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the parties in the 1 2 above-referenced matter have reached a settlement. By April 28, 2017, or as soon as the 3 conditions of the settlement agreement have been fulfilled, the parties expect to file a stipulated 4 dismissal with prejudice as to Plaintiff Jamal Austin’s claims against all Defendants. The parties 5 have agreed to suspend any interim deadlines in the case. Each party will bear its own fees and 6 costs. 7 In addition, the parties respectfully request that the Case Management Conference 8 currently scheduled for March 7, 2017, be reset for April 28, 2017, or a date thereafter that is 9 conducive to the Court’s calendar. 10 11 DATED: February 28, 2017 By: /s/ Melanie M. Blunschi Melanie M. Blunschi (Bar No. 234264) 505 Montgomery St. Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 melanie.blunschi@lw.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Jamal Austin DATED: February 28, 2017 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL By: /s/ Amy Leifur Halby Amy Leifur Halby (Bar No. 287216) The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Phone: (415) 353-0999 Fax: (415) 353-0990 ahalby@bfesf.com Attorneys for Defendants The County of Alameda, Deputy McBride and Deputy Nagy 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1 JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; JOINT STIP. REQ. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET CMC Case No.: 3:15-cv-00942-EMC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. reset for 4/27/2017 2 10 S ER FO n M. Che LI dward Judge E R NIA OO IT IS S IFIED S MOD A A H 9 RT 8 4/20/2017. Hon. Edward M. Chen D United States District Judge RDERE NO 7 UNIT ED 6 2/28/17 DATED: _______________ Joint RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C Statement due TA ____________________________________ at 10:30 a.m. 3 4 The Further CMC is N D IS T IC T R OF C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 2 JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; JOINT STIP. REQ. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET CMC Case No.: 3:15-cv-00942-EMC 1 2 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing 3 Joint Notice of Settlement. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, 4 Melanie M. Blunschi, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 5 DATED: February 28, 2017 6 7 /s/ Melanie M. Blunschi Melanie M. Blunschi 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 3 JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; JOINT STIP. REQ. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET CMC Case No.: 3:15-cv-00942-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?