Quillan v. CIGNA Healthcare of California, Inc.
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR FILING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Lyllyth Quillan Case Management Statement due by 1/7/2016. Case Management Conference reset for 1/14/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/20/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
Glenn R. Kantor, Esq. [SBN 122643]
e-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net
Timothy J. Rozelle, Esq. [SBN 298332]
e-mail: trozelle@kantorlaw.net
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818) 350-6272
Russell G. Petti, State Bar No. 137160
THE LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL G. PETTI
7 466 Foothill Blvd., # 389
La Canada, California 91011
8 818 952-2168Telephone
818 952-2186 Facsimile
9 Email: Rpetti@petti-legal.com
6
10
Counsel for Plaintiff Lillyth Quillan
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
13
14
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LILLYTH QUILLAN,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
vs.
CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF
CALIFORNIA, INC.,
Defendant.
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:15-cv-00989-EMC
STIPULATION FOR FILING
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff, Lillyth Quillan and Defendant Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc.
21
22
(“Cigna”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the
23
following:
24
1.
This lawsuit, which is governed by the Employee Retirement Income
25
Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) involves
26
Plaintiff’s claims for recovery of denied health benefits;
27
28
2.
After cooperative discussions between counsel, it has been determined that
the ERISA Plan responsible for paying benefits is self-funded rather than
1
1
insured. As such the current Defendant, Cigna, only acted as the
2
administrator for the Plan, and is not the proper defendant here;
3
3.
The parties to this lawsuit therefore stipulate to the filing of the First
4
Amended Complaint, which is attached to this Stipulation as Exhibit A.
5
This First Amended Complaint removes Cigna as the defendant, and adds
6
the Visa Inc. Cigna Network POS Plan (the “Visa Plan”);
7
4.
The First Amended Complaint will have to be served on the Visa Plan, and
8
Cigna’s present counsel is uncertain whether he will be retained to represent
9
the Visa Plan. As such, the Parties submit that it would be prudent to
10
continue the Case Management Conference, currently set for November 24,
11
2015, for four weeks to allow for new counsel to appear and become
12
sufficiently familiar with this matter to participate in the CMC.
It is So Stipulated
13
14
15
DATED: November 16, 2015
DATED: November 16, 2015
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL G.
17 PETTI
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
16
18
BY:
19
20
S/Russell G. Petti
Russell G. Petti
Attorney for Plaintiff
Lillyth Quillan
BY:
S/Sean P. Nalty
Sean P. Nalty
Attorney for Defendant
Cigna Healthcare of California,
Inc.
21
22
PROPOSED ORDER
23
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES and for Good
24
25
Cause shown, the following is hereby Ordered:
26
1.
is hereby filed; and
27
28
That the First Amended Complaint attached to this Stipulation as Exhibit A
///
2
1
2.
The Case Management Conference currently set for November 24, 2015 is
Janaury 14, 2016
2
reset for December
3
file a Case Management Statement no later than seven days prior to the new
4
Case Management Conference date.
9:30am.
. The Parties are further Ordered to
IT IS SO ORDERED
5
Date: November 202015
,
S
RT
J
ER
H
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
R NIA
NO
11
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
FO
10
D
The Honorable Edward M. ChenDERE
SO OR ED
IT IS
United States District JudgeDIFI
AS MO
LI
9
UNIT
ED
8
RT
U
O
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
6
, 2015 at
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?