Quillan v. CIGNA Healthcare of California, Inc.

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR FILING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Lyllyth Quillan Case Management Statement due by 1/7/2016. Case Management Conference reset for 1/14/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/20/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Glenn R. Kantor, Esq. [SBN 122643] e-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net Timothy J. Rozelle, Esq. [SBN 298332] e-mail: trozelle@kantorlaw.net KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, CA 91324 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818) 350-6272 Russell G. Petti, State Bar No. 137160 THE LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL G. PETTI 7 466 Foothill Blvd., # 389 La Canada, California 91011 8 818 952-2168Telephone 818 952-2186 Facsimile 9 Email: Rpetti@petti-legal.com 6 10 Counsel for Plaintiff Lillyth Quillan 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 13 14 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LILLYTH QUILLAN, Plaintiff, 16 17 18 vs. CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant. 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:15-cv-00989-EMC STIPULATION FOR FILING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff, Lillyth Quillan and Defendant Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc. 21 22 (“Cigna”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the 23 following: 24 1. This lawsuit, which is governed by the Employee Retirement Income 25 Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) involves 26 Plaintiff’s claims for recovery of denied health benefits; 27 28 2. After cooperative discussions between counsel, it has been determined that the ERISA Plan responsible for paying benefits is self-funded rather than 1 1 insured. As such the current Defendant, Cigna, only acted as the 2 administrator for the Plan, and is not the proper defendant here; 3 3. The parties to this lawsuit therefore stipulate to the filing of the First 4 Amended Complaint, which is attached to this Stipulation as Exhibit A. 5 This First Amended Complaint removes Cigna as the defendant, and adds 6 the Visa Inc. Cigna Network POS Plan (the “Visa Plan”); 7 4. The First Amended Complaint will have to be served on the Visa Plan, and 8 Cigna’s present counsel is uncertain whether he will be retained to represent 9 the Visa Plan. As such, the Parties submit that it would be prudent to 10 continue the Case Management Conference, currently set for November 24, 11 2015, for four weeks to allow for new counsel to appear and become 12 sufficiently familiar with this matter to participate in the CMC. It is So Stipulated 13 14 15 DATED: November 16, 2015 DATED: November 16, 2015 KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL G. 17 PETTI OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 16 18 BY: 19 20 S/Russell G. Petti Russell G. Petti Attorney for Plaintiff Lillyth Quillan BY: S/Sean P. Nalty Sean P. Nalty Attorney for Defendant Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc. 21 22 PROPOSED ORDER 23 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES and for Good 24 25 Cause shown, the following is hereby Ordered: 26 1. is hereby filed; and 27 28 That the First Amended Complaint attached to this Stipulation as Exhibit A /// 2 1 2. The Case Management Conference currently set for November 24, 2015 is Janaury 14, 2016 2 reset for December 3 file a Case Management Statement no later than seven days prior to the new 4 Case Management Conference date. 9:30am. . The Parties are further Ordered to IT IS SO ORDERED 5 Date: November 202015 , S RT J ER H 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 R NIA NO 11 . Chen ward M udge Ed FO 10 D The Honorable Edward M. ChenDERE SO OR ED IT IS United States District JudgeDIFI AS MO LI 9 UNIT ED 8 RT U O 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 6 , 2015 at N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?