Maersk Line v. Specialty Fibres LLC

Filing 16

ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND RELATED DEADLINES. Case Management Statement due by 8/27/2015. Case Management Conference set for 9/3/2015 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/27/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Stephen M. Uthoff, State Bar No. 145206
E-mail: [e-mail]
The Uthoff Law Corporation
401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 710
Long Beach, California 90802
Tele: 562-437-4301
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MAERSK LINE

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

MAERSK LINE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SPECIALTY FIBRES LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
__________________________________)

Case No. CV 15-1006 MEJ

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

21
22

Good cause appearing therefor:

23

The case management conference is hereby continued to September 3, 2015, 10:00 a.m.

24

Courtroom B of the above captioned court. Further Plaintiff’s counsel may appear

25
26

telephonically. All deadlines are adjusted accordingly.
It is so ordered.
_________________________
Hon. Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

)
)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

ss.

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age
of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 401 E. Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 710, Long Beach, California 90802.
On May 26, 2015 I served the foregoing document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
on the interested parties in this action by placing a copy thereof enclosed in a sealed
envelope addressed as follows:

11
12
13

Specialty Fibres LLC
3201 Danville Blvd., Suite 265
Alamo, CA 94507

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

[X] BY MAIL: I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Long Beach,
California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am readily
familiar with this firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing.
Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on the same day with
postage thereon fully prepaid at Long Beach, California in the ordinary course of
business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit
for mailing in affidavit.
[ ] BY FACSIMILE: I served a true copy of the document(s) described on all parties to
this action by facsimile transmission, and the transmission was reported as complete and
without error. A copy of the transmission report properly issued by the transmitting
facsimile machine is attached hereto and shows the date, time and telephone number of
the transmitting facsimile machine. Facsimile transmissions were sent and addressed as
stated above:
[X] Federal: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this
court at whose direction the service was made.
Executed on May 26, 2015 at Long Beach, California.

27

_s/Stephen M. Uthoff_______
Stephen M. Uthoff

28

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE