Perez v. Ahmed et al
Filing
28
ORDER TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/18/2015. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of
Labor, United States Department of
Labor,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
)
NATIONAL CONSOLIDATED
COURIERS, INC., a corporation, and )
TANWEER AHMED, an individual )
)
Defendants.
)
)
No.: 3:15-cv-01026 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
COMPEL PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS
19
20
21
22
On May 4, 2015, a status conference was held regarding the administrative
subpoenas issued to Defendants by the Secretary of Labor, and issues related
thereto.
On March 17, 2015, the Court ordered Defendants to produce all responsive
23
documents to the Secretary’s administrative subpoenas by no later than April 12,
24
2015. Dkt. No 16, p. 3:22-23. The Court also ordered Defendant Ahmed to
25
produce all emails in his custody and control and responsive to the Secretary’s
1
1
administrative subpoenas to attorneys for the Secretary no later than March 26,
2
2015. See id., p. 3:18-21.
3
4
5
6
On March 27, 2015, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to continue the
two aforementioned deadlines and set new deadlines as follows: the March 26,
2015 deadline was continued to April 2, 2015; and the April 12, 2015 deadline was
continued to April 27, 2015.
To date, Defendants have failed to comply with the administrative
7
subpoenas and failed to comply with both deadlines to produce that were set by the
8
Court. See Dkt. Nos. 16 and 18. Defendants have not produced any email
9
communications to the Secretary, and have produced only a small number of other
10
11
12
13
14
15
documents, in violation of the Court’s orders.
After hearing arguments from counsel for both parties at the May 4, 2015
status conference, the Court orders as follows:
(1)
By no later than May 18, 2015, Defendants shall produce, directly to
the Secretary and in a form that is easily accessible, all documents and files in their
possession, custody, or control which may be responsive to the administrative
subpoenas, including but not limited to all electronic files copied from Defendants’
16
computers and other electronic storage devices, including but not limited to
17
electronic mails and text messages.
18
(2)
Any document or file withheld by Defendants as privileged shall be
19
identified on a privilege log. Documents must be identified by including on the
20
privilege log information sufficient to identify the title of the document, who
21
22
23
24
25
created it, and when it was created. Email communications must be identified by
including on the privilege log information sufficient to identify:
(a) the date;
(b) the sender;
(c all recipients;
(d) the subject line; and
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
(e) any attachments.
(3)
Only documents individually identified on the privilege log, as
explained above, may be withheld. All other documents shall be turned over
immediately to the Secretary. Defendants shall serve the privilege log on the
Secretary by no later than May 18, 2015.
(4)
Beginning on May 19, 2015, the Secretary is authorized to obtain
directly from Kivu Consulting copies of all documents and files that Kivu
7
Consulting has obtained from or on behalf of Defendants. Kivu Consulting shall
8
fully and immediately cooperate with the Secretary’s requests and shall produce
9
the records in an accessible and searchable format. Defendants are required to
10
promptly pay Kivu Consulting for its services – consistent with this Court’s
11
Temporary Restraining Order, see Dkt. No. 16, paragraph 4 – with sufficient time
12
to enable Kivu Consulting to provide all documents and files to the Secretary
13
14
15
16
17
beginning May 19, 2015, including the costs necessary for Kivu to produce the
records in an accessible and searchable format. Nothing in this order prevents the
Secretary from communicating directly with Kivu Consulting prior to May 19,
2015, to, inter alia, request information, estimates of costs for services, or status
updates on Defendants’ compliance.
(5)
When reviewing documents and files produced by Defendants, the
18
Secretary shall take all reasonable steps to avoid reviewing, and to return to
19
Defendants, attorney-client privileged communications. The Secretary shall
20
maintain a log of all such communications encountered when reviewing
21
22
23
24
Defendants’ documents, including:
(a)
the identity of the person who discovered the communication;
(b)
the date and time the communication was discovered;
(c)
the date and time Defendants were notified of the
communication; and
25
3
1
(d)
Defendants.
2
3
4
5
6
the manner in which the communication was returned to
Copies of this log shall be made available to Defendants or the Court upon request.
(6)
Defendants shall prepare a report detailing their efforts to conduct a
diligent search for documents responsive to the administrative subpoenas. The
report must describe all steps taken to locate documents, including all custodians
and locations, when such steps were taken, and, if and when documents were
7
provided to counsel for review. The report shall be provided to the Secretary not
8
later than May 18, 2015.
9
(7)
A hearing is hereby set for 8:00 A.M. on June 11, 2015, where
10
Defendants must show cause, if any exists, why a preliminary injunction should
11
not issue enjoining Defendants from further destruction of evidence and interfering
12
with the Secretary’s investigation. If the parties are able to stipulate to a proposed
13
14
15
injunction, then there will be no need for this hearing.
(8)
All other motions shall also be heard at 8:00 A.M. on June 11, 2015.
Motions shall be filed by May 28, 2015; Oppositions shall be filed by June 4,
2015; Replies shall be filed by June 8, 2015.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
21
Dated: May 18, 2015.
________________________________
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?