Hills Conservation Network v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
Filing
115
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/17/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Michael R. Lozeau (CA Bar No. 142893)
e-mail: michael@lozeaudrury.com
Richard T. Drury (CA Bar No. 163559)
e-mail: richard@lozeaudrury.com
Rebecca L. Davis (State Bar No. 271662)
e-mail: rebecca@lozeaudrury.com
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
410 12th Street, Suite 250
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: (510) 836-4200
Fax: (510) 836-4205
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
HILLS CONSERVATION NETWORK, a
non-profit corporation,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 3:15-cv-01057-LB
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R.
CIV. P. 41(a)(2)
v.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY, a federal
agency; KAREN ARMES, in her official
capacity, MARK GHILARDUCCI, in his
official capacity; THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; CITY
OF OAKLAND, a California municipality;
and EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK
DISTRICT, a special district,
Hon. Laurel Beeler
Defendants.
For the reasons stated in the government's response at ECC No 122:
There being good cause shown, and in the interest of finality, Plaintiff Hills Conservation
Network’s request to dismiss this action with prejudice under the authority of Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(a)(2) is GRANTED.
28
[Proposed] Order of Dismissal – Case No. 3:15-cv-01057-LB
1
1
2
3
This matter is HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is instructed to
close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
October 17
Dated: ______________, 2016
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order of Dismissal – Case No. 3:15-cv-01057-LB
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?