Hills Conservation Network v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al

Filing 115

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/17/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Michael R. Lozeau (CA Bar No. 142893) e-mail: michael@lozeaudrury.com Richard T. Drury (CA Bar No. 163559) e-mail: richard@lozeaudrury.com Rebecca L. Davis (State Bar No. 271662) e-mail: rebecca@lozeaudrury.com LOZEAU DRURY LLP 410 12th Street, Suite 250 Oakland, CA 94607 Tel: (510) 836-4200 Fax: (510) 836-4205 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 HILLS CONSERVATION NETWORK, a non-profit corporation, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Case No. 3:15-cv-01057-LB ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, a federal agency; KAREN ARMES, in her official capacity, MARK GHILARDUCCI, in his official capacity; THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; CITY OF OAKLAND, a California municipality; and EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT, a special district, Hon. Laurel Beeler Defendants. For the reasons stated in the government's response at ECC No 122: There being good cause shown, and in the interest of finality, Plaintiff Hills Conservation Network’s request to dismiss this action with prejudice under the authority of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) is GRANTED. 28 [Proposed] Order of Dismissal – Case No. 3:15-cv-01057-LB 1 1 2 3 This matter is HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 October 17 Dated: ______________, 2016 LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order of Dismissal – Case No. 3:15-cv-01057-LB 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?