Ho v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Filing 18

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 16 Stipulation selecting Early Neutral Evaluation (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2015)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jerry Ho et. a!. Plaintiff(s), CASE NO. C-15-01128 HSG v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORbER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Defendant(s).. l .. ------------------~ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: D Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) X Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. S) D Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ' ----(Note: Parties whooelieve that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than.any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone col'!forence and may not file this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeed for ADR Phone Conforence. See Civil Local Rule 16-BandADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: D Private ADR (please identify process and provider) - - - - - - - - - The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: X the presumptive deadlinl) (The deadline is 90 days from the date ofthe order referring the case to ari ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) D other requested d e a d l i n e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: May 21,2015 Dated: May 21, 2015 CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED) ORDER D X D The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/28/2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?