Federal Trade Commission v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al

Filing 138

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 135 Stipulation Extend Case Deadlines. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Eric D. Edmondson, D.C. Bar No. 450294 Erika Wodinsky, Cal. Bar No. 091700 Jacob A. Snow, Cal. Bar No. 270988 Boris Yankilovich, Cal Bar No. 257887 901 Market Street, Suite 570, San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 848-5100 / (415) 848-5184 (fax) eedmondson@ftc.gov; ewodinsky@ftc.gov; jsnow@ftc.gov; byankilovich@ftc.gov Raymond E. McKown, Cal. Bar No. 150975 Stacy Procter, Cal. Bar No. 221078 Kenneth H. Abbe, Cal. Bar No. 172416 10877 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90024 (310) 824-4343 / (310) 824-4380 (fax) rmckown@ftc.gov; sprocter@ftc.gov; kabbe@ftc.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission Chad S. Hummel, SBN 139055 chummel@sidley.com Clayton S. Friedman, SBN 245513 cfriedman@sidley.com Mark D. Campbell, SBN 180528 mcampbell@sidley.com Michael Yaghi, SBN 202720 myaghi@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 17th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 595-2600 Facsimile: (310) 595-2601 Ryan M. Sandrock, SBN 251781 rsandrock@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 722-1200 Facsimile: (415)772-7400 Attorneys for Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-01129-HSG Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DIRECTV, a corporation, and STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES 24 25 26 DIRECTV, LLC, a limited liability company, Defendants. 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 15-CV-01129-HSG 1 Pursuant to the Court’s guidance during the April 7, 2016 case management conference, 1 2 and for the reasons set out in the parties’ prior Stipulated Motion to Extend Case Deadlines (Dkt. 3 129), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC 4 jointly move the Court to extend the case schedule as follows: 5 6 Fact Discovery Closes July 22, 2016 7 Opening Expert Reports Sept. 2, 2016 MSJ Filing Sept. 22, 2016 Rebuttal Expert Reports Sept. 30, 2016 MSJ Opposition Oct. 6, 2016 12 MSJ Reply Oct. 13, 2016 13 Reply Expert Reports Oct. 21, 2016 14 MSJ Hearing Oct. 27, 2016 15 Expert Discovery Closes Nov. 10, 2016 Settlement Conference Nov. 18, 20161 Pretrial Conference Jan. 17, 2017 Bench Trial Starts Jan. 30, 2017 8 9 10 11 16 17 18 19 20 SO STIPULATED: 21 Dated: April 11, 2016 /s/ Eric D. Edmondson Eric D. Edmondson Counsel for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission Dated: April 11, 2016 /s/ Chad S. Hummel Chad S. Hummel Counsel for Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 The parties respectfully request that the Court appoint a sitting United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District to conduct the mediation on that date. STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 15-CV-01129-HSG 2 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 12, 2016 ___________________________________ HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 15-CV-01129-HSG 3 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 1 2 I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing 3 STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES in 4 compliance with Civil Local Rule 5.1, I hereby attest that the signatory has concurred in this 5 filing. 6 7 Dated: April 12, 2016 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 8 9 10 By: /s/ Chad S. Hummel Chad S. Hummel Counsel for Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 15-CV-01129-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?