Federal Trade Commission v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al
Filing
138
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 135 Stipulation Extend Case Deadlines. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Eric D. Edmondson, D.C. Bar No. 450294
Erika Wodinsky, Cal. Bar No. 091700
Jacob A. Snow, Cal. Bar No. 270988
Boris Yankilovich, Cal Bar No. 257887
901 Market Street, Suite 570,
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 848-5100 / (415) 848-5184 (fax)
eedmondson@ftc.gov; ewodinsky@ftc.gov;
jsnow@ftc.gov; byankilovich@ftc.gov
Raymond E. McKown, Cal. Bar No. 150975
Stacy Procter, Cal. Bar No. 221078
Kenneth H. Abbe, Cal. Bar No. 172416
10877 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90024
(310) 824-4343 / (310) 824-4380 (fax)
rmckown@ftc.gov; sprocter@ftc.gov;
kabbe@ftc.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Federal Trade Commission
Chad S. Hummel, SBN 139055
chummel@sidley.com
Clayton S. Friedman, SBN 245513
cfriedman@sidley.com
Mark D. Campbell, SBN 180528
mcampbell@sidley.com
Michael Yaghi, SBN 202720
myaghi@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, 17th Floor Los
Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 595-2600
Facsimile: (310) 595-2601
Ryan M. Sandrock, SBN 251781
rsandrock@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 722-1200
Facsimile: (415)772-7400
Attorneys for Defendants
DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC
14
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 15-cv-01129-HSG
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
DIRECTV,
a corporation,
and
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES
24
25
26
DIRECTV, LLC,
a limited liability company,
Defendants.
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. 15-CV-01129-HSG
1
Pursuant to the Court’s guidance during the April 7, 2016 case management conference,
1
2
and for the reasons set out in the parties’ prior Stipulated Motion to Extend Case Deadlines (Dkt.
3
129), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC
4
jointly move the Court to extend the case schedule as follows:
5
6
Fact Discovery Closes
July 22, 2016
7
Opening Expert Reports
Sept. 2, 2016
MSJ Filing
Sept. 22, 2016
Rebuttal Expert Reports
Sept. 30, 2016
MSJ Opposition
Oct. 6, 2016
12
MSJ Reply
Oct. 13, 2016
13
Reply Expert Reports
Oct. 21, 2016
14
MSJ Hearing
Oct. 27, 2016
15
Expert Discovery Closes
Nov. 10, 2016
Settlement Conference
Nov. 18, 20161
Pretrial Conference
Jan. 17, 2017
Bench Trial Starts
Jan. 30, 2017
8
9
10
11
16
17
18
19
20
SO STIPULATED:
21
Dated: April 11, 2016
/s/ Eric D. Edmondson
Eric D. Edmondson
Counsel for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission
Dated: April 11, 2016
/s/ Chad S. Hummel
Chad S. Hummel
Counsel for Defendants DIRECTV and
DIRECTV, LLC
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
The parties respectfully request that the Court appoint a sitting United States Magistrate Judge
in the Northern District to conduct the mediation on that date.
STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. 15-CV-01129-HSG
2
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 12, 2016
___________________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. 15-CV-01129-HSG
3
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
1
2
I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing
3
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES in
4
compliance with Civil Local Rule 5.1, I hereby attest that the signatory has concurred in this
5
filing.
6
7
Dated: April 12, 2016
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
8
9
10
By: /s/ Chad S. Hummel
Chad S. Hummel
Counsel for Defendants DIRECTV and
DIRECTV, LLC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. 15-CV-01129-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?