Federal Trade Commission v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al

Filing 208

ORDER to file chart. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. (hsglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Case No. 15-cv-01129-HSG

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

DIRECTV, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER TO FILE JOINTLY
PREPARED CHART REGARDING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 177, 184, 187-88, 190-91, 193-

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

95, 197, 199
12
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and DIRECTV have fully briefed the FTC’s
13
motion for partial summary judgment, which is currently pending before the Court. See Dkt. No.
14
176 (original motion); Dkt. No. 183 (corrected motion); Dkt. No. 189 (opposition to motion); Dkt.
15
No. 196 (reply). The parties have filed administrative motions (including a supplemental
16
administrative motion) seeking sealing of these briefs and attached exhibits, as well as corrections
17
and oppositions to the administrative motions. See Dkt. Nos. 177, 184, 187-88, 190-91, 193-95,
18
197 & 199. This slew of filings has resulted in a muddy record of exactly what each party is
19
seeking to seal, what sealing each party opposes, and the bases for each party’s positions.
20
The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file, no later than Tuesday, November 22, 2016,
21
at 5:00pm, a jointly prepared chart that succinctly summarizes the documents sought to be sealed
22
and the positions of the parties as to each. Specifically, each row of the chart should list the
23
following information: (1) document sought to be sealed (e.g., “Opposition”); (2) docket number
24
of redacted version of the document; (3) docket number of unredacted version of document; (4)
25
pin citation of portion of document that is sought to be sealed (e.g., “7:15-8:5”); (5) party seeking
26
sealing (e.g., “DIRECTV”); (6) asserted grounds for sealing (e.g., “Divulges DIRECTV’s trade
27
secrets.”); (7) party opposing sealing (e.g., “FTC”); and, (8) asserted grounds for opposition (e.g.,
28

1

“DIRECTV previously disclosed this information to the public.”). Each of the numbered

2

categories above should be a separate column of the chart. If the parties seek to seal multiple

3

portions of the same document, each portion should be listed as a separate row in the chart. And

4

as illustrated by the examples above, the asserted grounds for sealing or opposition should be

5

expressed in a concise sentence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8
9

Dated:
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2