Federal Trade Commission v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION'S 58 MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DIRECTV'S 53 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION'S 60 MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR EXTENSION. Responses due by 11/24/2015; Replies due by 12/22/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Case No. 15-cv-01129-HSG

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

DIRECTV, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL TRADE
COMMISSION'S MOTION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO DIRECTV'S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
DENYING FEDERAL TRADE
COMMISSION'S MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME FOR EXTENSION
Re: Dkt. Nos. 58, 60

13
14

The Court has considered the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC’s”) Motion for an

15

Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court

16

GRANTS the motion. The FTC’s Motion to Shorten Time on Motion for an Extension is

17

DENIED AS MOOT.

18

The FTC’s response to DIRECTV’s motion for partial summary judgment shall be due

19

November 24, 2015. DIRECTV’s reply in support of its motion for partial summary judgment

20

shall be due on December 22, 2015.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/21/2015
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge