Tapia v. Independent Brewers United Corporation et al
Filing
26
ORDER. The plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. (See ECF No. 25.) Because the defendant answered, the mechanism for a dismissal without a court order is a stipulated dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) & (2). That said, given the parties joint representation that they settled the case (see ECF No. 23), the court orders the dismissal without prejudice. If any party certifies to the court within 90 days (with proof of service on opposing counsel) that the a greed consideration has not been delivered, then this order will stand vacated, and this case will be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, then after 90 days, the dismissal will be with prejudice. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/15/2015. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
DAVID TAPIA,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
No. 3:15-cv-01133-LB
ORDER
v.
INDEPENDENT BREWERS UNITED
CORPORATION, et al.,
15
16
17
Defendants.
___________________________________/
The plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. (See ECF No. 25.1) Because the
18
defendant answered, the mechanism for a dismissal without a court order is a stipulated dismissal.
19
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) & (2). That said, given the parties’ joint representation that they
20
settled the case (see ECF No. 23), the court orders the dismissal without prejudice. If any party
21
certifies to the court within 90 days (with proof of service on opposing counsel) that the agreed
22
consideration has not been delivered, then this order will stand vacated, and this case will be
23
restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, then after 90 days, the dismissal
24
will be with prejudice.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: December 15, 2015
27
__________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
28
1
Citations are to the Electronic Case File (“ECF”); pin cites are to the ECF-generated page
numbers at the tops of the documents.
ORDER
No. 3:15-cv-01133-LB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?