Gidding v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al

Filing 110

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 109 Stipulation Motion Hearing set for 2/16/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN R. GIDDING, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; THOMAS E. C. SMITH; 15 TERESE SMITH; GLENDONBROOK PTY LTD.; DS CONTRACTS PTY LTD.; DALY 16 SMITH PTY LTD.; DALY SMITH CORPORATION (AUST.) PTY LTD.; 17 DALY SMITH CORPORATION (MANAGEMENT SERVICES) PTY LTD., 18 and DOES 1 through 100, 19 20 21 CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01176-HSG ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 TO ENLARGE TIME FOR HEARING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Current Last Day for Hearing on Dispositive Motions: January 26, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. Proposed New Date: February 16, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. (or the next available date) Defendants. Submitted Concurrently With: 1. Stipulation to Extend Time For Hearing; and 2. Declaration of Lindsey A. Morgan; 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01176-HSG 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME 1 The stipulated request by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company 2 (“Zurich”) and Plaintiff John Gidding under Local Rule 6-2 to enlarge the time for hearing 3 Zurich’s dispositive motion from the current hearing deadline of January 26, 2017 to 4 February 16, 2017 is GRANTED. The hearing deadline on dispositive motions in this case 5 is hereby changed to February 16, 2017. 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 10 Dated: December 9, 2016 __________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01176-HSG 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME 1 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Michelle Mejia, hereby certify that: I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. My business address 4 is Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1410, San Francisco, California 94111. 3 On December 6, 2016, I caused the [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 TO ENLARGE TIME 6 FOR HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS to be served upon the parties listed below via U.S. Mail, as required by Local Rule 5-5: 7 VIA U.S. MAIL 8 John Gidding 9 44 Rue Tony Neuman Luxembourg, LX L-2241 10 Luxembourg johngidding@me.com 11 BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed 12 to the persons at the addresses listed in the Service List and placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar 13 with Sinnott, Puebla, Campagne & Curet, APLC's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that the correspondence is placed for 14 collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. 15 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 16 Executed at San Francisco, California on this 6th day of December, 2016. 5 17 18 By: MICHELLE MEJIA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01176-HSG 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?