Gidding v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al

Filing 110

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 109 Stipulation Motion Hearing set for 2/16/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 JOHN R. GIDDING,
Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.

14 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY; THOMAS E. C. SMITH;
15 TERESE SMITH; GLENDONBROOK PTY
LTD.; DS CONTRACTS PTY LTD.; DALY
16 SMITH PTY LTD.; DALY SMITH
CORPORATION (AUST.) PTY LTD.;
17 DALY SMITH CORPORATION
(MANAGEMENT SERVICES) PTY LTD.,
18 and DOES 1 through 100,
19
20
21

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01176-HSG
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 6-2 TO ENLARGE TIME FOR
HEARING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Current Last Day for Hearing on
Dispositive Motions:
January 26, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
Proposed New Date:
February 16, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. (or the
next available date)

Defendants.
Submitted Concurrently With:
1. Stipulation to Extend Time For
Hearing; and
2. Declaration of Lindsey A. Morgan;

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01176-HSG
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME

1

The stipulated request by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company

2 (“Zurich”) and Plaintiff John Gidding under Local Rule 6-2 to enlarge the time for hearing
3 Zurich’s dispositive motion from the current hearing deadline of January 26, 2017 to
4 February 16, 2017 is GRANTED. The hearing deadline on dispositive motions in this case
5 is hereby changed to February 16, 2017.
6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9
10

Dated: December 9, 2016
__________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01176-HSG
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME

1
2

PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Michelle Mejia, hereby certify that:

I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California. I am
over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. My business address
4 is Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1410, San Francisco, California 94111.
3

On December 6, 2016, I caused the [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 TO ENLARGE TIME
6 FOR HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS to be served upon the parties listed
below via U.S. Mail, as required by Local Rule 5-5:
7
VIA U.S. MAIL
8
John Gidding
9 44 Rue Tony Neuman
Luxembourg, LX L-2241
10 Luxembourg
[e-mail]
11
BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed
12 to the persons at the addresses listed in the Service List and placed the envelope for
collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar
13 with Sinnott, Puebla, Campagne & Curet, APLC's practice for collecting and processing
correspondence for mailing. On the same day that the correspondence is placed for
14 collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United
States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
15
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
16 Executed at San Francisco, California on this 6th day of December, 2016.
5

17
18

By:
MICHELLE MEJIA

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01176-HSG
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME