Asberry, II v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District ("BART") et al

Filing 15

ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. John Burris and Adante D. Pointer failed to appear as ordered at the regularly scheduled case manageme nt conference. Accordingly, each said attorney is ordered to show cause in writing, no later than July 10, 2015, why sanctions should not be imposed on him for his failure to appear at the case management conference.Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 26, 2015.(mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

ROBERT JAMES ASBERRY II,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

No. C-15-1190 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL FOR
PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR
AT CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

v.
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT,
Defendant.

/

16
17

On June 26, 2015, neither of plaintiff’s counsel, specifically, John Burris and Adante

18

D. Pointer, appeared as ordered at the regularly scheduled case management conference.

19

(See Case Management Conference Order, filed April 28, 2015.)

20

Accordingly, each said attorney is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing,

21

no later than July 10, 2015, why sanctions should not be imposed on him for his failure to

22

appear at the case management conference.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 26, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge