Mayer Hoffman McCann, PC v. CAMICO Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 190

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/13/17. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2017)

S
6 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
7

ER

R NIA

n

FO

an Illsto

H

5

David A. Tartaglio (State Bar No. 117232)
[e-mail]
Laura K. Kim (State Bar No. 197944)
[e-mail]

RT

4

us
Judge S

LI

3

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

A

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 2000
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-3383
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]

UNIT
ED

2

RT
U
O

MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP

NO

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MAYER HOFFMAN McCANN, P.C., a
12 Missouri Corporation,

CASE No. 3:15-cv-01207-SI
(Case assigned to Hon. Susan Illston)

13

Plaintiff,

14

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AND
COUNTER-CLAIM

vs.

15 CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, a California Corporation,
16
Defendant.
17

Trial Date: May 15, 2017

18 AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM
19
20
21

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff MAYER HOFFMAN McCANN, P.C. (“MHM”)

22 and Defendant CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (“CAMICO”), by and through
23 their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal
24 Rules of Civil Procedure to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims and counter-claims by both
25 parties in this action.
26

Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses.

27

MHM and CAMICO also agree to pay its share of the jury fees as ordered by the Court.

28 ///
1053070.1

Case No. 3:15-cv-01207-SI
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AND COUNTER-CLAIM

1

As a result of this stipulation, there are no remaining claims or parties in this matter.

2 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
3 DATED: May 31, 2017

MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP

4
5

By:

6
7

/s/ David A. Tartaglio
David A. Tartaglio
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

8
9

DATED: May 31, 2017

TUCKER ELLIS LLP

10
11

By:

12
13

/s/ Chelsea R. Mikula
Robert A. Cutbirth
Chelsea R. Mikula
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
MAYER HOFFMAN McCANN, P.C.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MUSICK, PEELER
& GARRETT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1053070.1

Case No. 3:15-cv-01207-SI
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AND COUNTER-CLAIM