Onate v. Cox Media Group

Filing 14

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2015)

Download PDF
UMTED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANNE ONATE CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01217-EMC Plaintiff(s), V. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS COX MEDIA GROUP, INC. doing business as KTVU-TV; and DOES 1 tbrough 50, inclusive, Defendant(s). Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agee to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 111 D EA Non-binding Arbitration (ADRL.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R.. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than my other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Needfor ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: D Private ADR (please identib) process and provider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: El the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered ) Lii other requested deadline Dated: 7/15/2015 Dated: 7/15/2015 tto y for Defendant Douglas E. Dexter [PROPOSED] ORDER R NIA en d M. Ch RT dwar Judge E FO UNIT ED 7/22/15 ERED O ORD IT IS S NO Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S LI The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. LI x El A H UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ER C JUDGEN F D IS T IC T O R When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?