Onate v. Cox Media Group
Filing
14
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2015)
UMTED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANNE ONATE
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01217-EMC
Plaintiff(s),
V.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
COX MEDIA GROUP, INC. doing
business as KTVU-TV; and DOES 1
tbrough 50, inclusive,
Defendant(s).
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agee to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
111
D
EA
Non-binding Arbitration (ADRL.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R.. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than my other form ofADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Needfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
D
Private ADR (please identib) process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
El
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered )
Lii
other requested deadline
Dated: 7/15/2015
Dated: 7/15/2015
tto y for Defendant
Douglas E. Dexter
[PROPOSED] ORDER
R NIA
en
d M. Ch
RT
dwar
Judge E
FO
UNIT
ED
7/22/15
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
LI
The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
LI
x
El
A
H
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
ER
C
JUDGEN
F
D IS T IC T O
R
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?