Kevin Cochrane v. Open Text Corporation et al
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS UNOPPOSED MOTION TO APPROVE BOND AND STAY EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 62(D) 45 .(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
KEVIN COCHRANE, an individual,
14
15
16
17
18
Petitioner,
v.
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION, a Canadian
corporation and OPEN TEXT INC., a
Delaware corporation,
Respondents.
Case No. 3:15-cv-01234-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
RESPONDENTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
APPROVE BOND AND STAY EXECUTION
OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 62(D)
Date:
August 13, 2015
Time:
8:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 8 – 19th Floor
Judge:
Hon. William Alsup
19
Motion Filed: June 30, 2015
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO APPROVE BOND
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01234-WHA
1
THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on Respondents’ Unopposed Motion to
2
Approve Bond and Stay Execution of Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
3
62(d) (the “Motion”), and having considered the Parties’ papers, oral argument, and all other
4
pleadings and papers filed herein:
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in Respondents’ Memorandum of
6
Points and Authorities in Support of their Motion, Respondents’ Motion is GRANTED.
7
Respondents are ordered to lodge the Bond described in the Motion, a copy of which was
8
attached to the concurrently filed June 30, 2015 Declaration of Nathaniel R. Cooper as Exhibit A,
9
with the Clerk of the Court within ten (10) days of this Order. Pursuant to Rule 62(d), execution
10
of this Court’s June 16, 2015 Judgment is automatically stayed pending resolution of
11
Respondents’ appeal.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
July 6,
Dated: ____________, 2015
Hon. William Alsup
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO APPROVE BOND
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01234-WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?