Zbitnoff v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al.

Filing 28

ORDER Granting STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND to Motion to Dismiss 27 .(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2015) Modified on 7/8/2015 (dtmS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203) ELENA K. KOUVABINA (State Bar No. 235918) 2 ekk@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON 3 A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 5 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 6 Attorneys for Defendant NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC 7 8 ANNA ZBITNOFF P.O. Box 832 9 Redwood Valley, CA 95470 Telephone: (707) 489-0201 10 11 Pro Se Plaintiff 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 ANNA ZBITNOFF, Case No. 3:15-CV-01241-WHA 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC; 19 SAGE POINT LENDER SERVICES; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) Judge: The Hon. William H. Alsup Action Filed: March 17, 2015 22 23 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to L.R. 7-12, by and between Defendant 25 Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Nationstar” or “Defendant”) and Plaintiff Anna Zbitnoff, pro se, 26 (together, the “Parties”), that Plaintiff shall receive a fourteen (14) day extension of time to July 27 21, 2014, to file its response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. This is the first stipulation seeking 28 an extension of time. 3:15-CV-01241-WHA STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 1 Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is currently due on July 7, 2015. 2 The parties stipulate to an extension of time for two reasons. First, Plaintiff misunderstood that 3 the response to the originally filed motion would be due on the originally scheduled date after the 4 cases were related and the Court ordered that the originally noticed motion should be re-noticed. 5 After the motion was re-noticed, court staff entered docket text stating the response would due on 6 July 21, 2015. Later court staff added a revised docket text stating the response was due on July 7, 7 2015. Secondly, the legal document assistant who is assisting Plaintiff has suffered a death in the 8 family. Should this stipulation be approved, Defendant will have until July 28, 2015 to file the 9 reply brief. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 DATED: July 7, 2015 13 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 14 By: 15 /s/ Elena Kouvabina Elena K. Kouvabina 16 Attorneys for Defendant NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC 17 18 DATED: July 7, 2015 19 20 By: 21 /s/ Anna Zbitnoff Anna Zbitnoff 22 Plaintiff Anna Zbitnoff, in pro per 23 24 25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 July 8, 2015. 27 DATED: __________________ By: ____________________________ JUDGE WILLIAM H. ALSUP 28 2 3:15-CV-01241-WHA STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?