World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc v. Rodriguez

Filing 24

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND ORDER OF SEIZURE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 4/20/2015. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC, Plaintiff, 8 9 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND ORDER OF SEIZURE v. 10 DOMINIC ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 15-cv-01263-VC Defendants. 12 13 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s March 18, 2015 Verified Complaint 14 and Ex Parte Motion For Temporary Restraining Order, Order for Seizure of Counterfeit Marked 15 Goods and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue (the “Motion”). 16 This Court held a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion on March 23, 2015, issued a Temporary 17 Restraining Order and Order of Seizure enjoining and restraining Defendants from manufacturing, 18 19 20 assembling, selling, offering for sale, distributing, offering to distribute or holding for sale any merchandise which has not been authorized by Plaintiff, World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. 21 (“WWE”) and which bears any mark, word or name identical or confusingly similar to any 22 trademarks or service marks owned by WWE, and ordering the seizure of such goods bearing 23 counterfeit marks sold in the vicinity of any venue where WWE’s Wrestlemania® 31 Weekend 24 Events in San Jose and Santa Clara, California from twenty-four (24) hours before those events 25 began on March 26, 2015 until twenty-four (24) hours following the completion of said events on 26 27 28 March 30, 2015. Plaintiff has now requested entry of a preliminary injunction and order of seizure against 1 Defendants, Dominic Angel Rodriguez, Vu Truong Tran, Benhamine Adham Pechetti, Ibraham 2 Nimer Shiheiber, John and Jane Does, and XYZ Corporations (collectively, “Defendants”) for 3 alleged violations of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1116 and 1125(a). The Court convened 4 a hearing on Plaintiff’s request on April 7, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. at the United States District Court 5 for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102 6 7 in Courtroom 4, at which only counsel for Plaintiff appeared to present evidence supporting Plaintiff’s request. Defendants have not responded to the Verified Complaint, have not made any 8 9 filing in this case, nor have they appeared in this matter either individually or through counsel. The Court has carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint, the accompanying supporting 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Declarations of Matthew Ball, Esq. and Lauren Dienes-Middlen, each with exhibits thereto, the 12 memorandum of law, the Amended Complaint, Supplemental Declaration of Lauren Dienes- 13 14 Middlen and the evidence presented at the hearings. NOW, on presentation and consideration of all pleadings and proceedings presented to the 15 16 17 Court, the Court finds as follows. 1. WWE exclusively owns or controls the numerous trademarks and service marks 18 associated with its wrestling entertainment business, including, but not limited to, the marks set 19 forth in Exhibits 1 and 2 hereto, (collectively, the “WWE Marks”). WWE has the exclusive right 20 to use and license others to use the WWE Marks on goods and to use the WWE Marks in 21 connection with rendering services. WWE also exclusively owns or controls all right, title and 22 interest in the names, likenesses and rights of publicity for its current wrestlers. The WWE Marks 23 24 are distinctive and are widely recognized by the public. Goods that bear any mark, word, or name 25 identical or confusingly similar to any of the WWE Marks or the names or likenesses of any of 26 WWE’s current wrestlers shall be known herein as the “Enjoined Goods.” All of the WWE Marks 27 listed in Exhibit 1 are either currently pending or registered with the United States Patent and 28 Trademark Office. 2 1 2. Defendants, who are not licensed or authorized by WWE to use the WWE Marks, 2 and those acting in concert or participation with them, were and will be present on the premises or 3 within a five-mile radius of the venues where WWE’s live events shall be occurring beginning on 4 March 26, 2015 and ending March 28, 2016, including, but not limited to, the San Jose 5 Convention Center, San Jose University, Camera 12 Theater, Levi’s Stadium and the SAP Center, 6 which were the locations in Santa Clara and San Jose, California where WWE’s Wrestlemania® 31 7 Weekend Events occurred from March 26 through March 30, 2015, for the purpose of 8 9 manufacturing, distributing, offering for sale, and selling Enjoined Goods. It appears to this Court that Defendants, and those acting in concert or participation with them, will continue to infringe 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 the WWE Marks and to commit unfair competition against WWE by manufacturing, distributing, 12 offering for sale and selling Enjoined Goods, on the premises or within a five-mile radius of halls, 13 14 arenas, stadiums, or other venues where WWE live events shall occur, including those events listed on the schedule set forth in Exhibit 3 hereto. 15 16 17 3. The Enjoined Goods were located on the premises or within a five-mile radius of the venues where WWE’s Wrestlemania® 31 Weekend Events that occurred in Santa Clara and 18 San Jose from March 26 through March 30, 2015, including, but not limited to, the San Jose 19 Convention Center, San Jose University, Camera 12 Theater, Levi’s Stadium and the SAP Center, 20 and will be located on the premises or within a five-mile radius of halls, arenas, stadiums, or other 21 venues where other WWE events shall be occurring during the nationwide series of live events, 22 including but not limited to those indicated in Exhibit 3 hereto. 23 24 4. The Enjoined Goods are goods bearing “counterfeit marks” within the meaning of 25 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d). The distribution, sale or offering the sale of the Enjoined Goods would 26 cause confusion or mistake or be likely to deceive and would constitute trademark infringement 27 under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and would constitute false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. § 28 1125(a). 3 1 5. Copies of the Court’s March 24, 2015 Order to Show Cause, and the Summons and 2 Verified Complaint have been served upon Defendants, and Enjoined Goods have been obtained 3 from the Defendants. 4 5 6 6. WWE is likely to succeed in showing that the Defendants have used counterfeit or infringing marks in connection with the sale, offering for sale or distribution of goods or services. 7. WWE will suffer immediate and irreparable injury and will have no adequate 7 remedy at law if this Court denies to grant a preliminary injunction and order of seizure. 8 9 8. The harm to WWE should this Court not grant the requested preliminary injunction and order of seizure clearly outweighs any harm which the Defendants might incur if the 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 preliminary injunction is granted. 12 13 14 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendants, including the John and Jane Does, and XYZ Corporations not yet identified, along with their partners, associates, agents, servants, employees, representatives, and 15 16 17 18 assigns, and all others under their control or in active concert or participation with them, and all other persons and entities having actual knowledge hereof be, and the same hereby are, ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from: 19 (a) manufacturing, assembling, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale, distributing, or offering to distribute any Enjoined Goods which have not been authorized by Plaintiff and which bear any of the trademarks and service marks of Plaintiff, including but not limited to those set forth in Exhibits 1 and 2 hereto, or any marks confusingly similar thereto, including, but not limited to, WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT®, WWE®, WRESTLEMANIA®, and the WWE® logos. (b) representing by any method whatsoever that the Enjoined Goods were sponsored, manufactured, sold or licensed by WWE and otherwise taking any action likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception on the part of the public as to the origin of the Enjoined Goods. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2. Any on-duty federal, state, or local law enforcement officers are hereby authorized 27 28 to seize and maintain in their custody and control any and all Enjoined Goods and counterfeit 4 1 marks, and the means of making them, and records documenting the manufacture, sale or receipt 2 of things relating thereto, in the possession, dominion or control of Defendants, their agents or 3 persons acting in concert or participation with them, including all such Enjoined Goods and 4 counterfeit marks located in or on any containers, vessels, or motor vehicles. All seized items 5 shall be delivered up to the care and custody of Plaintiff or Plaintiff’s attorneys pending further 6 instructions from the Court. The seized goods shall be kept in identifiable containers. The law 7 firm of K&L Gates LLP is authorized to serve as custodian of the seized goods under 15 U.S.C. § 8 9 10 1116(d)(7). 3. The law enforcement officers acting hereunder are authorized to carry out the United States District Court Northern District of California 11 foregoing on the premises or within a five-mile radius of the venues where a WWE live event 12 occurs during the duration of this Order, including but not limited to, from twenty-four (24) hours 13 14 before any such event begins to twenty-four (24) hours following the completion of said event. 4. Defendants shall cooperate with the law enforcement officers executing such 15 16 17 18 seizure hereunder, shall provide the items sought to be seized wherever such items are maintained and shall provide their correct names, residential and business addresses and telephone numbers. 5. Simultaneously with any seizure made pursuant to this Order, or as soon thereafter 19 as is practical under the circumstances, each Defendant shall be served with a copy of this Order, 20 the Amended Complaint in this action, and a copy of the attached Notice of Right to Object to 21 Seizure by the law enforcement officer, or by any person over the age of 18 years who is not a 22 party to this action. The Notice of Right to Object to Seizure must be served as a separate 23 24 25 document. 6. Any Defendant who is served with a copy of this Order and whose Enjoined Goods 26 are seized may, without having to appear in person in this Court, object to the provisions hereof 27 and/or the seizure by submitting to the Court in writing his or her objections within two weeks. 28 The objection may, but need not be, submitted on the objection form attached to the Notice of 5 1 Right to Object to Seizure of Goods. The objection must be submitted in accordance with the 2 procedures detailed in the attached Notice of Right to Object to Seizure of Goods. No such 3 objection, however, shall serve to suspend this Order or stay the terms hereof unless otherwise 4 ordered by this Court. 5 6 7. The Injunction Bond posted by WWE in the amount of $10,000 shall remain in full force and effect throughout the duration of this Order. 7 8. This Order shall expire twenty-four (24) hours after the March 28, 2016 WWE 8 9 Live Event listed on Exhibit 3 hereto. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within one month of the expiration of this Order, WWE shall file any necessary motions and/or request for a Final Hearing in this Action . 13 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2015 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC, Case No. 15-cv-01263-VC NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT TO SEIZURE OF GOODS Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 7 DOMINIC ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TO THE PERSON WHOSE GOODS WERE SEIZED: You have the right to object to the seizure of your goods, and the right to object to the enforcement of the Preliminary Objection and Seizure Order against you. You may object by completing the attached objection form, and mailing it to the following address: Hon. Judge Vince Chhabria United States District Court Judge United States District Court for the Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 18 19 You must mail the objection to the Court no later than 14 days after the seizure. This 14- 20 day period will begin on the date shown on the proof of service, and end on the day on which your 21 objection is postmarked. If the 14th day is a Saturday or Sunday, or Court holiday, the 14-day 22 deadline will be extended to the following Monday. The Court recommends that you mail the 23 objection as soon as possible after the seizure, because objections sent after the 14-day deadline 24 has expired will not be considered. 25 You are not required to use the attached objection form. However, if you do not use the 26 attached objection form, please include the following information in your objection: (1) an 27 explanation of why your goods should not have been seized; (2) an estimate of the amount of 28 money you lost as a result of the seizure, and how you calculated that number; and (3) your name 7 1 2 and address, and a telephone number where you can be reached. With regards to the explanation of why your goods should not have been seized, the 3 objection must specifically describe what goods were seized, and identify the World Wrestling 4 Entertainment representative who authorized you to sell the seized goods. 5 The objection must further contain the following language: 6 7 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 The objection must also be signed, and dated. Unsigned objections and objections that do not contain the “penalty of perjury” language will not be considered by the Court. The Court may contact you via telephone with questions concerning your objection. 12 Please do not telephone the Court, because the Court will not be able to answer any questions 13 concerning the seizure or the objection process. 14 If the Court agrees with your objection, the Court may order the seized goods returned to 15 you, and may order that you be paid for any damages that you suffered as a result of the seizure. 16 If the Court does not agree with your objection, the seized goods will not be returned to you, and 17 you will not be paid any damages. 18 19 Dated: April 20, 2015 _______________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 OBJECTION TO SEIZURE OF GOODS 1 2 3 4 5 To: Hon. Judge Vince Chhabria United States District Court Judge United States District Court for the Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 6 7 Re: World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Rodriguez, Case No. 15-cv-1263 8 9 10 I, _______________________________(name), hereby object to the seizure of my goods that took place on ____________________(date), for the following reason: United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 13 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 14 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 15 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 16 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 17 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 18 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 19 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 20 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 21 (you may attach additional pages as necessary) 22 23 24 The goods that were seized are as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________________ 25 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 26 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 27 (you may attach additional pages as necessary) 28 9 1 2 The World Wrestling Entertainment representative who authorized me to sell the seized goods is______________________. (if you have written authorization, please provide a copy). 3 As a result of the seizure, I suffered the following money damages: 4 ______________________________________________________________________________________ 5 6 7 ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ (describe damages and explain why you believe the number to be correct) 8 9 I live at the following address:_________________________________________ (address), and my 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 telephone number is ______________________________ (telephone number). 12 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 13 14 Date:____________________________ (write the date on which you signed this form) 15 16 ___________________________________ 17 Signature 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?