World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc v. Rodriguez
Filing
35
Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 34 Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Matthew G. Ball (SBN 208881)
matthew.ball@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 882-8200
Facsimile: (415) 882-8220
Attorneys for Plaintiff WORLD WRESTLING
ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Robert F. Kane
rkane1089@aol.com
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT F. KANE
870 Market Street, Suite 1128
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (415) 982-1510
Facsimile: (415) 982-5821
Attorney for Defendants DOMINIC ANGEL
RODRIGUEZ, VU TRUONG TRAN, and
BENJAMIN ADHAM PECHETTI
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
WORLD WRESTLING
ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
vs.
DOMINIC ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, VU
TRUONG TRAN, BENJAMIN ADHAM
PECHETTI, IBRAHAM NIMER
SHIHEIBER, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1100, and XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-100,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case Number: C 15-01263-VC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND EXTEND RULE 26(f) DEADLINES;
[PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND RULE 26(f)
DEADLINES and [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case Number: C 15-01263-VC
1
The parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this STIPULATION TO
2
CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND RULE 26(f)
3
DEADLINES and [PROPOSED] ORDER pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-2.
4
5
WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference is presently set for June 16, 2015,
at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 4;
6
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants filed an appearance in this court on June 1, 2015,
7
and as such, the parties would like sufficient time to determine if they can resolve the matters
8
between them at minimal cost, and minimal consumption of judicial resources;
9
WHEREAS, counsel hereby affirm that they have conferred and agree regarding the
10
following request for relief; counsel have no objection to this continuance; and neither party is
11
prejudiced by such continuance;
12
IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED, that the Initial Case Management Conference be
13
continued by forty-five (45) days, and that all Rule 26(f) deadlines be similarly extended by
14
forty-five (45) days, the date of the Conference to be July 31, 2015, or as hereafter determined by
15
the Court.
16
17
Dated: June 5, 2015
/s/ Matthew G. Ball
Matthew G. Ball
Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD WRESTLING
ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Dated: June 5, 2015
/s/ Robert F. Kane
Robert F. Kane
Attorney for Defendants DOMINIC ANGEL
RODRIGUEZ, VU TRUONG TRAN, and
BENJAMIN ADHAM PECHETTI
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND RULE 26(f)
DEADLINES and [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case Number: C 15-01263-VC
1
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
2
3
4
5
I hereby attest pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1 that concurrence in the electronic filing of
this document has been obtained from the other signatory.
Dated: June 5, 2015
/s/ Matthew G. Ball
Matthew G. Ball
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
14
The above STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
15
AND EXTEND RULE 26(f) DEADLINES and [PROPOSED] ORDER is approved. The Initial
16
Case Management Conference is hereby continued to July 31, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom
17
August 4, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.
4, [or as follows: _________________________________________]. All Rule 26(f) deadlines
18
are hereby extended by forty-five (45) days.
19
S
June 9, 2015
Dated: _________________
22
23
26
27
A
H
ER
LI
RT
25
FO
NO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ia
Chhabr
e Vi n c e
Judg
24
28
DERED
SO OR
IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO
R NIA
UNIT
ED
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND RULE 26(f)
DEADLINES and [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case Number: C 15-01263-VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?