Alexander v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
31
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/23/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Matthew D. Mellen (Bar No. 233350)
Jessica Galletta (SBN: 281179)
Eunji Cho (Bar No. 286710)
MELLEN LAW FIRM
411 Borel Avenue, Suite 230
San Mateo, California 94402
Telephone: (650) 638-0120
Facsimile: (650) 638-0125
Attorney for Plaintiff,
KAREN ALEXANDER
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
KAREN ALEXANDER, an individual;
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
Case No.: 3:15-cv-01336-MEJ
[Assigned to the Hon. Judge Maria-Elena
James]
v.
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION
REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a business
entity; U.S. BANK, N.A., a business entity;
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., a
business entity; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Action Removed: March 23, 2015
Trial Date:
N/A
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
Pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal as to Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE
2
BANK, N.A., U.S. BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
3
SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO LASALLE BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF
4
THE HOLDERS OF WAMU MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-
5
AR14, and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. (“Defendants”) executed by the parties
6
and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED
7
AND DECREED:
8
9
10
1. Plaintiff KAREN ALEXANDER (“Plaintiff”)’s causes of action against Defendants
are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice;
2. Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own fees and costs.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
23
DATED: November ____, 2015
___________________________________
Hon. Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?