Alexander v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 31

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/23/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Matthew D. Mellen (Bar No. 233350) Jessica Galletta (SBN: 281179) Eunji Cho (Bar No. 286710) MELLEN LAW FIRM 411 Borel Avenue, Suite 230 San Mateo, California 94402 Telephone: (650) 638-0120 Facsimile: (650) 638-0125 Attorney for Plaintiff, KAREN ALEXANDER 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KAREN ALEXANDER, an individual; 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No.: 3:15-cv-01336-MEJ [Assigned to the Hon. Judge Maria-Elena James] v. ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a business entity; U.S. BANK, N.A., a business entity; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., a business entity; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Action Removed: March 23, 2015 Trial Date: N/A Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 Pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal as to Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE 2 BANK, N.A., U.S. BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 3 SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO LASALLE BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF 4 THE HOLDERS OF WAMU MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006- 5 AR14, and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. (“Defendants”) executed by the parties 6 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED 7 AND DECREED: 8 9 10 1. Plaintiff KAREN ALEXANDER (“Plaintiff”)’s causes of action against Defendants are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice; 2. Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own fees and costs. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 23 DATED: November ____, 2015 ___________________________________ Hon. Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?