Amatrone et al v. Champion et al

Filing 110

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 103 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Audrey Hahn, Claudiu Lupascu. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 1, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2016)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

ROBERT AMATRONE, et al.,

Case No. 15-cv-01356-JST

Plaintiffs,
5
ORDER VACATING HEARING

v.
6
7

RANDY CHAMPION, et al.,

Re: ECF No. 103

Defendants.
8
9

Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Audrey Hahn and Claudiu
Lupascu. ECF No. 103. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on

12

this matter, currently scheduled for February 18, 2016, is hereby VACATED.

13

If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date

14

of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has

15

been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented

16

argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient

17

to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the

18

party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the

19

Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 1, 2016
_____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge