Amatrone et al v. Champion et al

Filing 110

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 103 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Audrey Hahn, Claudiu Lupascu. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 1, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ROBERT AMATRONE, et al., Case No. 15-cv-01356-JST Plaintiffs, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 7 RANDY CHAMPION, et al., Re: ECF No. 103 Defendants. 8 9 Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Audrey Hahn and Claudiu Lupascu. ECF No. 103. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on 12 this matter, currently scheduled for February 18, 2016, is hereby VACATED. 13 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 14 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 15 been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 16 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 17 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 18 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 19 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 1, 2016 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?