Amatrone et al v. Champion et al

Filing 130

ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS re 128 Objection filed by Robert Amatrone. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 18, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ROBERT AMATRONE, et al.,

Case No. 15-cv-01356-JST

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO ORDER
GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

9
10

RANDY CHAMPION, et al.,

Re: ECF No. 128

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Plaintiffs have filed a document entitled “Objections to Order Granting Motions to

13

Dismiss,” ECF No. 128, that references the Court’s February 18, 2016 order granting two motions

14

to dismiss, ECF No. 122, as well as the Court’s February 26, 2016 order dismissing several

15

defendants for failure to effect service, ECF No. 126. Plaintiffs’ “Objections” offer several

16

disagreements with the Court’s conclusions in both orders.

17

Although Plaintiffs have not sought leave under Civil L.R. 7-9(a), the Court construes this

18

document as a Motion for Reconsideration of both the Court’s February 18 and February 26

19

orders. So construed, the motion is denied. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated, under Civil L.R. 7-

20

9(b), that (1) “a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the

21

Court before entry” of the orders; (2) “emergence of new material facts or a change of law

22

occurring after the time” of the orders; or (3) a “manifest failure by the Court to consider material

23

facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court” before the orders.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 18, 2016
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge