The Wave Studio, LLC v. Amadeus North America, Inc. et al

Filing 31

FURTHER STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/9/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

NATE A. GARHART (State Bar No. 196872)
[e-mail]
VIJAY K. TOKE (State Bar No. 215079)
[e-mail]
COBALT LLP
918 Parker Street, Bldg. A21
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff
THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC

7
8
9
10
11

ROBERT A. WEIKERT (State Bar No. 121146)
[e-mail]
JOHN A. CHATOWSKI (State Bar No. 174471)
[e-mail]
NIXON PEABODY LLP
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
13

Attorney for Defendant
CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC, a New York
Limited Liability Company,

18
Plaintiff,
19
v.

Case No. 15-cv-01364-RS
ORDER
FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT CATHAY PACIFIC
AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

AMADEUS NORTH AMERICA, INC., a
Florida Corporation, CATHAY PACIFIC
AIRWAYS LTD., a Hong Kong
Corporation, KONINKLIJKE
LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ, N.V., a
Netherlands Antilles Corporation d/b/a KLM
ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES, JOHN LIM,
an individual d/b/a/ TRAVELS-WEB,
PRICELINE.COM LLC, a Delaware
Corporation and DOES 1-100,

Complaint filed:
Complaint served:
Original Response
due:
Response due by
First stipulation:
Response due by
this stipulation:

Defendants.

27
28
-1FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

March 24, 2015
May 21, 2015
June 11, 2015
July 13, 2015
July 31, 2015

1

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5 and 6-1(a), it is HEREBY STIPULATED by and

2

between Plaintiff THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CATHAY PACIFIC

3

AIRWAYS LTD. (“Defendant”), that Defendant shall have up to and including July 31, 2015 to

4

answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, including but not limited to a challenge as to

5

service, jurisdiction and/or venue.

6

WHEREAS, this is the second extension of Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint.

7

The parties previously stipulated to an extension for Defendant to respond to the Complaint from

8

June 11, 2015 to July 13, 2015. [Dkt. No. 18].

9

WHEREAS, the parties believe that a further extension of time for Defendant to respond to

10

the Complaint up to and including July 31, 2015, will not alter the date of any event or any deadline

11

already fixed by the Court.

12

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through

13

their respective counsel, that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by no

14

later than July 31, 2015.

15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16

Respectfully submitted,

17
18

Dated: July 8, 2015

COBALT LLP

19
20

By /s/ Vijay K. Toke
Vijay K. Toke

21
Attorneys for Plaintiff
THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC

22
23

Dated: July 8, 2015

NIXON PEABODY LLP

24
25
26

By /s/ Robert A. Weikert
Robert A. Weikert
Attorney for Defendant
CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD.

27
28

-2FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
1
2
3
4

I, Robert A. Weikert, attest that I am one of the attorneys for Defendant Cathay Pacific
Airways Ltd., and as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that pursuant to United States
District Court, Northern District of California, Civil L.R. 5-l(i)(3), concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from Vijay K. Toke, the above signatory.

5
Dated: July 8, 2015
6

By /s/ Robert A. Weikert
Robert A. Weikert

7
8

ORDER
9
PURSUANT TO ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12

Dated: July ___, 2015
9

________________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge

13
14

4820-0324-1509.1

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT