Richard Cahill v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING re 12 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/22/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Rex M. Clack, Esq. (SBN 59237)
[e-mail]
David E. Russo, Esq. (SBN 112023)
[e-mail]
STERLING, CLACK & RUSSO
A Professional Corporation
601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2018
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendant
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &
TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
RICHARD CAHILL
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.

15
16
17

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &
TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, et al.
Defendants.

18
19

) Case No.: 3:15-CV-01374-JCS
)
) STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
) TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:15-CV-01374-JCS

1

Plaintiff RICHARD CAHILL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE,

2

HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT (“Defendant”), by and through their respective

3

counsel of record, hereby stipulate that pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), defendant may have an

4

extension of time, to and including June 11, 2015, to file an Answer to the Complaint.

5
6

Dated: 5/21/15

STERLING, CLACK & RUSSO

7
By: /s/ David E. Russo________
David E. Russo
Attorneys for Defendant
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &
TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

8
9
10
11
12

Dated: 5/21/15

LAW OFFICES OF LYLE C. CAVIN, JR.

13
By: /s/ Lia T. Marks___________
Lia T. Marks
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICHARD CAHILL

14
15
16
17

The filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

18

obtained from each of the other signatories.

19

R NIA

LI

FO

S

ER

Spero

H

25

RT

24

Judge Jo

D

RDERE

seph C.

NO

23

OO
IT IS S

A

22

Dated: 5/22/15

ICT
C

S
TE
TA

RT
U
O

21

21510615/P/Stip for Ext of Time to Answer Complaint
DISTR

UNIT
ED

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
2
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:15-CV-01374-JCS