Rosendin Electric, Inc. v. Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Company et al

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING 9 STIPULATION Selecting ADR Process. CASE REFERRED to Mediation. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/15/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2015)

1 William T. Eliopoulos (State Bar No. 100633)
[e-mail]
2 Kaveh Badiei (State Bar No. 215179)
[e-mail]
3 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
Five Palo Alto Square
4 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 200
Palo Alto, CA 94306-9814
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-320-9905
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff (Real Party In Interest)
7 ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC.
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC.,
Plaintiff,

16
17

vs.

Case No. 4:15-cv-01376-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

District Judge: Hon. Kandis A. Westmore
HATHAWAY DINWIDDIE
18 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
Action Filed: March 25, 2015
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY
19 COMPANY OF AMERICA, FEDERAL
INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1-50,
20 inclusive,
21

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached
the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5;
Court Processes:
□

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

□

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R.5)
-1-

174/022879-0058
8500799.1 a06/02/15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case No. 15-01376 HSG

1

X

Mediation (ADR L.R.6)

2 (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
3 appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate
4 in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of
5 Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
6

Private Process:

7

□

8

___________________________________________________________________

Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

9 _________________________________________
10 The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
11

□

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

12

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

13

X

other requested deadline
June 30, 2016.

14
15 Dated: June 2, 2015
16

RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
By:

17
18

/s/ William T. Eliopoulos
William T. Eliopoulos
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Rosendin Electric, Inc.

19
20 Dated: Signature authorized June 2, 2015_ MILLER MORTON CAILLAT & NEVIS,
LLP
21
By:

22
23
24
25

/s/ Stephanie M. Rocha
Stephanie M. Rocha
Attorneys for Hathaway-Dinwiddie
Construction Company, Travelers
Casualty and Surety Co. of America, and
Federal Insurance Company

26
27
28
-2174/022879-0058
8500799.1 a06/02/15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case No. 15-01376 HSG

1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2

□
X

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

□

The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5 Dated:
6

6/15/2015

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3174/022879-0058
8500799.1 a06/02/15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case No. 15-01376 HSG