Superpoints LLC v. Rakuten, Inc. et al
Filing
52
SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to Add Parties 10/30/2015. Fact Discovery due 1/29/2016. Expert Disclosures due 2/19/2016. Expert Rebuttal due 3/25/2016. Expert Discovery due 4/8/2016. Dispositive Motions due 4/29/2016. Pretrial Conference State ment due 7/12/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/22/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 8/15/2016 - 8/25/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 2, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
SUPERPOINTS LLC,
Case No. 15-cv-01387-JST
Plaintiff,
9
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
10
11
RAKUTEN, INC., et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
16
Event
Deadline
17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings
October 30, 2015
Fact discovery cut-off
January 29, 2016
20
Expert disclosures
February 19, 2016
21
Expert rebuttal
March 25, 2016
22
Expert discovery cut-off
April 8, 2016
Deadline to file dispositive motions
April 29, 2016
Pretrial conference statement due
July 12, 2016
Pretrial conference
July 22, 2016 at
2:00 p.m.
Trial
August 15, 2016 at
8:30 a.m.
18
19
23
24
25
26
27
28
Event
1
2
Deadline
Estimate of trial length (in days)
Eight
3
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
4
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
5
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
6
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
7
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
8
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
9
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
10
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
12
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
13
to grant a continuance.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: July 2, 2015
17
18
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?