Gary Daniel James Kennedy v. James Ruben Bedgood et al

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS JASON VANDERPOOL; MATTHEW ALLENDORPH;MEGAN MILLER & JOHN FORTNER only re 59 . Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/3/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ., SBN 69888 DEWITT M. LACY, ESQ., SBN 258789 LATEEF H. GRAY, ESQ., SBN 250055 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTRE 7677 OAKPORT STREET, SUITE 1120 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94621 TELEPHONE: (510) 839-5200 FACSIMILE: (510) 839-3882 john.burris@johnburrislaw.com dewitt.lacy@johnburrislaw.com lateef.gray@johnburrislaw.com 9 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 The Law Offices of John L. Burris 8 Attorney(s) for Plaintiff GARY KENNEDY 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 GARY DANIEL JAMES KENNEDY, an individual, 16 17 Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:15-cv-01404-EMC STIPULATED NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(1) and [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES RUBEN BEDGOOD, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; BEN PADILLA, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; KRIS DEE, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; JAKE SPENCER, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; RYAN MCDONALD, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; SANTIAGO CASTILLO, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; JOHN FORTNER; MATTHEW ALLENDORPH, individually and in his STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(1) 3:15-cv-01404-EMC 1 2 3 4 official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; MEGAN MILLER, individually and in her official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; JASON VANDERPOOL, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH. 5 6 Defendants. 7 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 8 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 The Law Offices of John L. Burris IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their 9 10 designated counsel, to voluntarily dismiss Defendants JASON VANDERPOOL; MATTHEW 11 ALLENDORPH; MEGAN MILLER & JOHN FORTNER pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 12 with prejudice. Each party agrees to bear his or her own costs and attorneys’ fees. 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 17 Dated: December 22, 2016 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 18 By: __/s/ Lateef H. Gray Lateef H. Gray Attorney(s) for Plaintiff 19 20 . 21 22 23 24 Dated: December 22, 2016 By: * /s/ Noah Blechman Attorney for Defendants *Mr. Blechman has given his consent for this document to be electronically filed. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(1) 3:15-cv-01404-EMC . [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 Pursuant to the stipulation by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel, Defendants JASON VANDERPOOL; MATTHEW ALLENDORPH; MEGAN MILLER & JOHN FORTNER are hereby dismissed as Defendants in this action 5 pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) with prejudice. Each party agrees to bear his or her own 6 costs and attorneys’ fees. 13 S _________________________________ Chen ard M. HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN dge Edw Ju 14 15 R NIA Dated: December _____, 2016 DERED FO 12 January 3, 2017 UNIT ED 11 ER A H 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 10 O OR IT IS S RT The Law Offices of John L. Burris SO ORDERED. NO 9 RT U O 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(1) 3:15-cv-01404-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?