Gary Daniel James Kennedy v. James Ruben Bedgood et al
Filing
60
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS JASON VANDERPOOL; MATTHEW ALLENDORPH;MEGAN MILLER & JOHN FORTNER only re 59 . Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/3/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ., SBN 69888
DEWITT M. LACY, ESQ., SBN 258789
LATEEF H. GRAY, ESQ., SBN 250055
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
AIRPORT CORPORATE CENTRE
7677 OAKPORT STREET, SUITE 1120
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94621
TELEPHONE: (510) 839-5200
FACSIMILE: (510) 839-3882
john.burris@johnburrislaw.com
dewitt.lacy@johnburrislaw.com
lateef.gray@johnburrislaw.com
9
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
8
Attorney(s) for Plaintiff
GARY KENNEDY
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
GARY DANIEL JAMES KENNEDY, an
individual,
16
17
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 3:15-cv-01404-EMC
STIPULATED NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(1) and
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JAMES RUBEN BEDGOOD, individually
and in his official capacity as a police officer
for the CITY OF ANTIOCH; BEN
PADILLA, individually and in his official
capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF
ANTIOCH; KRIS DEE, individually and in
his official capacity as a police officer for the
CITY OF ANTIOCH; JAKE SPENCER,
individually and in his official capacity as a
police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH;
RYAN MCDONALD, individually and in his
official capacity as a police officer for the
CITY OF ANTIOCH; SANTIAGO
CASTILLO, individually and in his official
capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF
ANTIOCH; JOHN FORTNER; MATTHEW
ALLENDORPH, individually and in his
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(1)
3:15-cv-01404-EMC
1
2
3
4
official capacity as a police officer for the
CITY OF ANTIOCH; MEGAN MILLER,
individually and in her official capacity as a
police officer for the CITY OF ANTIOCH;
JASON VANDERPOOL, individually and in
his official capacity as a police officer for the
CITY OF ANTIOCH.
5
6
Defendants.
7
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
8
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their
9
10
designated counsel, to voluntarily dismiss Defendants JASON VANDERPOOL; MATTHEW
11
ALLENDORPH; MEGAN MILLER & JOHN FORTNER pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
12
with prejudice. Each party agrees to bear his or her own costs and attorneys’ fees.
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
17
Dated: December 22, 2016
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
18
By: __/s/ Lateef H. Gray
Lateef H. Gray
Attorney(s) for Plaintiff
19
20
.
21
22
23
24
Dated: December 22, 2016
By: * /s/
Noah Blechman
Attorney for Defendants
*Mr. Blechman has given his consent for
this document to be electronically filed.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(1)
3:15-cv-01404-EMC
.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
Pursuant to the stipulation by and between the parties to this action, through their
designated counsel, Defendants JASON VANDERPOOL; MATTHEW ALLENDORPH;
MEGAN MILLER & JOHN FORTNER are hereby dismissed as Defendants in this action
5
pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) with prejudice. Each party agrees to bear his or her own
6
costs and attorneys’ fees.
13
S
_________________________________
Chen
ard M.
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
dge Edw
Ju
14
15
R NIA
Dated: December _____, 2016
DERED
FO
12
January 3, 2017
UNIT
ED
11
ER
A
H
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
10
O OR
IT IS S
RT
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
SO ORDERED.
NO
9
RT
U
O
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
LI
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(1)
3:15-cv-01404-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?