Connally v. Salvatore Ristorante et al

Filing 12

ORDER GRANTING re 10 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Joint Inspection of the Premises filed by Patrick Connally. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/18/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 David J. Bowie (SBN 50167) Eric C. Schaffer (SBN 221883) BOWIE & SCHAFFER 2255 Contra Costa Blvd, Suite 305 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone (925) 939-5300 Telecopier (925) 609-9670 Attorneys for Defendants, SALVATORE RISTORANTE; ANGELA ALAGNA; SALVATORE PICCIONE; ANTONINA PICCIONE 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) ) SALVATORE RISTORANTE; WARREN ) NAN SOM and WINNIE CHI BING SOM, ) Trustees of the WARREN and WINNIE SOM ) FAMILY TRUST, dated May 24, 2004; ) ) ANGELA ALAGNA; SALVATORE ) PICCIONE; and ANTONINA PICCIONE, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) PATRICK CONNALLY, Case No. 3:15-cv-01410-JCS STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR JOINT INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 56(3) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ -1- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR JOINT INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 56(3) 1 2 Defendants, Salvatore Ristorante, Angela Alagna, Salvatore Piccione and Antonia Piccione were served with Summons and Complaint on April 29, 2015. Since service, they have sought 3 4 representation in this subject case from the Law Offices of Bowie & Schaffer. Mr. Bowie is 5 scheduled to depart on a 25th Anniversary vacation, Saturday May 16, 2015 to return to the office on 6 Tuesday, May 26, 2015. Since service of the Summons and Complaint, the aforesaid Defendants 7 have retained consultants to inspect the Premises from which they operate Salvatore Ristorante in 8 order to determine the feasibility of removal of certain architectural barriers which Plaintiff has 9 10 alleged to have precluded his use and enjoyment of the subject restaurant. Counsel for Plaintiff and 11 these subject Defendants have met and conferred by telephone and have proposed the following 12 Stipulation: 13 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Plaintiff and these subject Defendants, by 14 15 and through their respective attorneys, that Defendants may have to and including Friday, June 5, 16 2015 within which to file their response to the Complaint in this action; and 17 //// 18 //// 19 //// 20 21 //// 22 //// 23 //// 24 //// 25 26 //// 27 /// 28 /// ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ -2- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR JOINT INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 56(3) 1 2 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that, pursuant to General Order No. 56, the meeting in person at the subject Premises shall take place at a date and time mutually convenient to the parties 3 4 and counsel, but within the calendar month June 2015. 5 6 Respectfully submitted, Dated: May 14, 2015 BOWIE & SCHAFFER 7 By:_/s/David J. Bowie_____________________ 8 David J. Bowie Attorney for Defendants, SALVATORE RISTORANTE ANGELA ALAGNA; SALVATORE PICCIONE; ANTONINA PICCIONE 9 10 Dated: May 14, 2015 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, A Professional Law Corporation 12 13 By:_/s/Thomas E. Frankovich_________________ Thomas E. Frankovich Attorney for Plaintiff PATRICK CONNALLY 14 S ER ERED seph C. Spero LI Judge Jo H 21 RT 20 NO 19 Dated: 5/18/15 O ORD IT IS S A 18 UNIT ED 17 RT U O 16 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T R NIA 15 FO 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ -3- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR JOINT INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 56(3)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?