Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.

Filing 173

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 172 Ex Parte Application. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. a
Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
VMWARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.

16
17
18

VMWARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

19
20
21
22
23

Counterclaimant,

Case No. 15-cv-01414-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES
LTD.’S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE AMENDED DECLARATIONS OF
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN SUBMITTED IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PHOENIX
TECHNOLOGIES LTD.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, AND REPLY ISO PHOENIX’S
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Trial Date: November 28, 2016

v.
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. a
Delaware Corporation,
Counterdefendant.

24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PL.’ LEAVE TO
FILE AMENDED DECLARATIONS
CASE NO. 15-01414-HSG

1

Having reviewed and considered Plaintiff Phoenix Technologies Ltd.’s (“Phoenix”)

2

Application for Leave to File Amended Declarations of Whitty Somvichian Submitted In Support

3

of Plaintiff Phoenix Technologies Ltd.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Opposition to

4

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and Reply In Support of Phoenix’s Summary

5

Judgment Motion, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Phoenix’s

6

Application for Leave to File Amended Declarations of Whitty Somvichian is hereby

7

GRANTED.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _______________, 2016
September 27

10
11

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PL.’ LEAVE TO
FILE AMENDED DECLARATIONS
CASE NO. 15-01414-HSG