Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.

Filing 54

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 53 Stipulated Request FOR REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE CORLEY. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 COOLEY LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) (wsomvichian@cooley.com) DREW KONING (263082) (dkoning@cooley.com) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 COOLEY LLP AMANDA A. MAIN (260814) (amain@cooley.com) 3175 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 VMWARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. VMWARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Counterclaimant, 23 24 25 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE CORLEY v. 21 22 Case No. 15-cv-01414-HSG Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Courtroom: 15, 18th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA v. Trial Date: November 28, 2016 PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. a Delaware Corporation, 26 Counterdefendant. 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 122071208 STIP. REQ. FOR REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH MAG. JG. CORLEY; CASE NO. 15-01414-HSG 1 2 3 4 5 STIPULATED REQUEST This Stipulated Request is submitted by Phoenix Technologies Ltd. (“Phoenix”) and VMware, Inc. (“VMware”) (collectively, the “Parties”). WHEREAS, on June 25, 2015, the Parties participated in an initial ADR Phone Conference call held by Howard A. Herman, Director of the Court’s ADR Program. 6 WHEREAS, on September 22 and 29, 2015, the Parties participated in further ADR 7 Phone Conferences with Mr. Herman and have agreed that this dispute should be referred to a 8 settlement conference with the Honorable Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. 9 10 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that this Court refer this matter to a settlement conference with the Honorable Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. 11 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 Dated: October 1, 2015 Dated: October 1, 2015 15 COOLEY LLP MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 16 /s/ Whitty Somvichian Whitty Somvichian /s/ Arturo J. González Arturo J. González Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant VMWARE, INC. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 122071208 1. STIP. REQ. FOR REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH MAG. JG. CORLEY; CASE NO. 15-01414-HSG 1 2 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The matter will be referred for 3 a settlement conference with the Honorable Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley, on a 4 mutually agreeable date to be determined among the parties and Judge Corley. 5 6 7 Date: October 2, 2015 8 _________________________________ The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 122071208 2. STIP. REQ. FOR REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH MAG. JG. CORLEY; CASE NO. 15-01414-HSG 1 ATTESTATION (Civil Local Rule 5-1 (i)(3)) 2 3 I, Whitty Somvichian, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 4 obtained from each of the other signatories. Executed on October 1, 2015 in San Francisco, 5 California. 6 /s/ Whitty Somvichian Whitty Somvichian 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 122071208 3. STIP. REQ. FOR REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH MAG. JG. CORLEY; CASE NO. 15-01414-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?