Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.

Filing 64

ORDER re January 28, 2016 Discovery Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/15/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., Case No. 15-cv-01414-HSG (DMR) Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE JANUARY 28, 2016 DISCOVERY HEARING 9 10 VMWARE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 62 Defendant. 12 The court has reviewed the parties’ January 8, 2016 joint discovery letter brief, which is set for hearing on January 28, 2016. [Docket No. 62.] In the letter, the parties seek resolution 14 regarding four discovery disputes. As to the disputes about Plaintiff’s privilege log and 15 Defendant’s response to interrogatory no. 8, it appears that the parties have not exhausted the meet 16 and confer process. As to the dispute about the date of Plaintiff’s production of documents 17 responses to request for production no. 40, this is an issue about which the parties should be able 18 to meet and confer and come to an agreement. Accordingly, the court orders the parties to appear 19 at the courthouse at 9:00 a.m. on January 28, 2016 to meet and confer prior to the 11:00 a.m. 20 hearing before the undersigned. At the 11:00 a.m. hearing, the parties shall be prepared to 21 succinctly describe any outstanding issue(s) raised in the January 8, 2016 joint letter. 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT ER H 28 R NIA . Ryu onna M Judge D NO 27 FO 26 ED RDER ______________________________________ IS SO O IT Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge LI 25 Dated: January 15, 2016 A 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. S 23 RT U O 13 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?