Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.
Filing
64
ORDER re January 28, 2016 Discovery Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/15/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
Case No. 15-cv-01414-HSG (DMR)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER RE JANUARY 28, 2016
DISCOVERY HEARING
9
10
VMWARE, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 62
Defendant.
12
The court has reviewed the parties’ January 8, 2016 joint discovery letter brief, which is set
for hearing on January 28, 2016. [Docket No. 62.] In the letter, the parties seek resolution
14
regarding four discovery disputes. As to the disputes about Plaintiff’s privilege log and
15
Defendant’s response to interrogatory no. 8, it appears that the parties have not exhausted the meet
16
and confer process. As to the dispute about the date of Plaintiff’s production of documents
17
responses to request for production no. 40, this is an issue about which the parties should be able
18
to meet and confer and come to an agreement. Accordingly, the court orders the parties to appear
19
at the courthouse at 9:00 a.m. on January 28, 2016 to meet and confer prior to the 11:00 a.m.
20
hearing before the undersigned. At the 11:00 a.m. hearing, the parties shall be prepared to
21
succinctly describe any outstanding issue(s) raised in the January 8, 2016 joint letter.
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
ER
H
28
R NIA
. Ryu
onna M
Judge D
NO
27
FO
26
ED
RDER
______________________________________
IS SO O
IT Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
LI
25
Dated: January 15, 2016
A
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
23
RT
U
O
13
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?