Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Kirton Communications Group Limited et al
Filing
30
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/22/2015)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC.,
Case No. 15-cv-01415-SI
Plaintiff,
6
v.
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
7
8
KIRTON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
LIMITED, et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
In accordance with the Order Granting Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment
13
Against Kirton Communications Group Limited and MAS Financial & Corporate Services
14
Limited, dated September 22, 2015, judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff Entrepreneur
15
Media, Inc. and against defendants Kirton Communications Group Limited and MAS Financial
16
and Corporate Services, Limited.
17
In addition said defendants, and their principals, officers, directors, members, partners,
18
agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons acting in concert or participating
19
with them, who receive actual notice of this injunction by personal or other service, are
20
PERMANENTLY ENJOINED as follows: they shall permanently:
21
1.
cease all use and never use the ENTREPRENEUR SPIRIT mark, the EMI marks,
22
or any other mark likely to cause confusion with the EMI marks, in connection with the
23
promotion, advertising, offering for sale, or sale, of any products or services;
24
2.
never use any false designation of origin, false representation, or any false or
25
misleading description of fact, that can, or is likely to, lead the consuming public or individual
26
members thereof, to believe that any products or services produced, offered, promoted, marketed,
27
advertised, provided, or sold by defendants are in any manner associated or connected with EMI,
28
or are licensed, approved, or authorized in any way by EMI;
1
3.
never represent, suggest in any fashion to any third party, or perform any act that
2
may give rise to the belief, that defendants, or any of their goods or services, are related to,
3
authorized by, or sponsored by EMI;
4
4.
cease all use of the domain name entrepreneurspirit.org and any similar domain
5
names, and never register any domain names that contain any of the EMI marks, or any domain
6
names confusingly similar to any of the EMI marks;
7
5.
cease all advertising of products or services under the ENTREPRENEUR SPIRIT
8
mark, including but not limited to defendants’ magazine, Facebook page, Twitter account, and
9
iTunes application;
10
6.
never unfairly compete with EMI in any manner whatsoever, or engage in any
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
unfair, fraudulent, or deceptive business practices that relate in any way to the production,
12
distribution, marketing, and/or sale of products and services bearing any of the EMI marks; and
13
14
7.
never apply for or seek to register the ENTREPRENEUR SPIRIT mark or any
mark that is likely to cause confusion with any of the EMI marks.
15
The Court further ORDERS defendants and their officers, directors, members, agents,
16
servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons acting in concert or participating with
17
them, to transfer to EMI all domain names in defendants’ possession, custody, or control that
18
include the word “entrepreneur” or any misspelling thereof, or are otherwise confusingly similar
19
to, or contain any of, the EMI Marks, including but not limited to entrepreneurspirit.org.
20
The Court further ORDERS defendants to file with the Court and serve upon EMI’s
21
counsel, within thirty (30) days after service of this order, a report in writing and under oath
22
setting forth in detail the manner and form in which Defendants have complied with this
23
injunction.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND ENJOINED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: September 22, 2015
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?