Clemens et al v. Hair Club for Men, LLC

Filing 63

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/18/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

TERESA CLEMENS, JORDEN
SIMENSEN, and ADRIA DESPRES,
individuals, for themselves and all
members of the putative class and on behalf
of aggrieved employees pursuant to the
Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”),
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16
17

No. C 15-01431 WHA

v.
HAIR CLUB FOR MEN, LLC, a Delaware
corporation, and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE
RE PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST
FOR CLARIFICATION

Defendants.
/

18
19

Plaintiffs sought to certify a class that would include employees that worked for Hair

20

Club from the start of the class period “until final judgment.” Plaintiffs aver that the alleged

21

wage-statement violations are ongoing. To avoid the practical challenges presented by

22

certifying an open-ended class that would encompass any new hire on a rolling basis, the order

23

certifying the class set the cutoff for the class period as May 27, 2015, the date of the complaint.

24

Plaintiffs seek to extend the class period to April 14, 2016, the date of the order certifying the

25

class. By NOON ON APRIL 21, Hair Club will please state whether it has any objection to

26

extending the class period as proposed by plaintiffs.

27
28

Dated: April 18, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE