Nathan Terry et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING 24 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTSMOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Matthew D. Mellen (Bar No. 233350)
Jessica Galletta (Bar No. 281179)
Eunji Cho (Bar No. 286710)
MELLEN LAW FIRM
411 Borel Avenue, Suite 230
San Mateo, California 94402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
NATHAN TERRY
GERALDINE TERRY

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

NATHAN TERRY, an individual; GERALDINE Case No.: 3:15-cv-01483-WHA
TERRY, an individual,
[Assigned to the Hon. William Alsup]
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
v.
RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a business
COMPLAINT
entity; U.S. BANK, N.A., a business entity; and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Date:
May 26, 2016
Defendants.
Time:
8:00 a.m.
Ctrm.: 8, 19th Floor

17
Complaint Filed: March 31, 2015
18
19
20

Plaintiffs NATHAN TERRY and GERALDINE TERRY (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants

21

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and U.S. BANK, N.A. (“Defendants”), through their counsel of

22

record, stipulate and agree as follows:
RECITALS

23
24
25
26
27
28

1.

WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’

Complaint, or in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement (Docket No. 21);
2.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs need one additional day to file their Opposition to

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint;
3.

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate to extend Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

1

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint by one day from May 2, 2016

2

to May 3, 2016;

3

4.

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate to extend Defendants’ deadline to file the Reply

4

in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint by one day from May 9, 2016

5

to May 10, 2016;

6

5.

WHEREAS, this stipulation waives no rights of either Party;

7

6.

WHEREAS, no other extension has previously been stipulated to, requested, or

8

granted.

9
10
11
12

STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT
1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended by one day from May 2, 2016 to May 3, 2016; and

13

2. The deadline for Defendants to file the Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion to

14

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended by one day from May 9, 2016 to May 10, 2016.

15
16

DATED: May 2, 2015

Respectfully submitted,
MELLEN LAW FIRM

17
18

___/s/ Eunji Cho____________
Eunji Cho, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
NATHAN TERRY
GERALDINE TERRY

19
20
21
22
DATED: May 2, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

23
24

SEVERSON & WERSON

25
26
27
28

__/s/ Jason Julian________ ___
Jason Julian, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
U.S. BANK, N.A.
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

1
2
3
4
5
6

Matthew D. Mellen (Bar No. 233350)
Jessica Galletta (Bar No. 281179)
Eunji Cho (Bar No. 286710)
MELLEN LAW FIRM
411 Borel Avenue, Suite 230
San Mateo, California 94402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
NATHAN TERRY
GERALDINE TERRY

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14

NATHAN TERRY, an individual; GERALDINE Case No.: 3:15-cv-01483-WHA
TERRY, an individual,
[Assigned to the Hon. William Alsup]
Plaintiffs,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
v.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a business
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’
entity; U.S. BANK, N.A., a business entity; and
COMPLAINT
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

15
Defendants.

Date:
Time:
Ctrm.:

16

May 26, 2016
8:00 a.m.
8, 19th Floor

17
Complaint Filed: March 31, 2015

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4

Having reviewed the above stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefore, It
IS SO ORDERED.
1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended by one day from May 2, 2016 to May 3, 2016; and

5

2. The deadline for Defendants to file the Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion to

6

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended by one day from May 9, 2016 to May 10, 2016.

7
8
9

May 3, 2016.
DATED: ___________________

____________________
Hon. William Alsup
United States District Court Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER