Taylor v. Colvin
Filing
20
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 19 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
SCOTT A. TAYLOR,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 15-01535 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
/
ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
16
17
Plaintiff filed his motion for summary judgment in this social security action on
18
December 15. The Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment was due on January
19
12. On February 1, the Commissioner filed a stipulation requesting a thirty-day extension,
20
citing counsel’s two-week absence from the office “over the holidays.” The Commissioner
21
offered no explanation for seeking the extension three weeks after the deadline. Nevertheless,
22
the Court extended the deadline to February 11.
23
On February 16, the Commissioner filed another stipulation requesting another thirty-
24
day extension, citing counsel’s “heavy workload including a pending brief in the Ninth Circuit
25
that is expected to take at least forty hours to prepare, review, and complete.” The
26
Commissioner again offered no explanation for seeking the extension after the deadline had
27
already elapsed.
28
1
There is no good cause for yet another thirty-day extension requested after the deadline.
2
It is time to move this case along. The Commissioner shall file a cross-motion for summary
3
judgment or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s motion by FEBRUARY 26 AT NOON.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: February 17, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?