Hauschild v. City of Richmond et al
Filing
107
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE 103 by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
THOMAS HAUSCHILD,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER CONTINUING
TRIAL DATE
CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,
Defendants.
/
14
15
No. C 15-01556 WHA
On account of Attorney David M. Poore’s medical leave of absence, this Court had
16
previously granted the parties’ stipulation to continue the trial date to November 7. Counsel
17
now seeks yet another continuance of the trial date to February 2017. This order CONTINUES
18
19
20
21
THE TRIAL DATE TO FEBRUARY 21, 2017, AT 7:30 A.M.
RESCHEDULED TO FEBRUARY 15, 2017, AT 2:00 P.M.
The final pretrial conference is
The parties shall serve and file any and
all oppositions to the pending motions in limine by NOVEMBER 10 AT NOON.
This continuance is granted on the strict condition that Attorney Scott A. Brown,
22
another attorney from the law firm representing plaintiff, come up to speed and be ready to try
23
this case on February 21. Attorney Poore may try the case on that date if he is ready, but in any
24
event, Attorney Brown must be ready to do so. Any objections to this condition must be filed
25
by OCTOBER 19 AT NOON.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: October 12, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?