Hauschild v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 107

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE 103 by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 THOMAS HAUSCHILD, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, v. ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., Defendants. / 14 15 No. C 15-01556 WHA On account of Attorney David M. Poore’s medical leave of absence, this Court had 16 previously granted the parties’ stipulation to continue the trial date to November 7. Counsel 17 now seeks yet another continuance of the trial date to February 2017. This order CONTINUES 18 19 20 21 THE TRIAL DATE TO FEBRUARY 21, 2017, AT 7:30 A.M. RESCHEDULED TO FEBRUARY 15, 2017, AT 2:00 P.M. The final pretrial conference is The parties shall serve and file any and all oppositions to the pending motions in limine by NOVEMBER 10 AT NOON. This continuance is granted on the strict condition that Attorney Scott A. Brown, 22 another attorney from the law firm representing plaintiff, come up to speed and be ready to try 23 this case on February 21. Attorney Poore may try the case on that date if he is ready, but in any 24 event, Attorney Brown must be ready to do so. Any objections to this condition must be filed 25 by OCTOBER 19 AT NOON. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: October 12, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?