Hauschild v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 120

ORDER RE 108 MOTION FOR DETERMINATION THAT PLAINTIFF IS NOT ENTITLED TO A JURY TRIAL. Bench Trial set for 2/21/2017 07:30 AM before Hon. William Alsup. Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/22/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
THOMAS HAUSCHILD,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

No. C 15-01556 WHA

Plaintiff,
ORDER RE MOTION FOR
DETERMINATION THAT
PLAINTIFF IS NOT ENTITLED
TO A JURY TRIAL

v.
CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,
Defendants.
/

15
16

This order clarifies that plaintiff’s claim for violation of POBR, the only claim

17

remaining in this case (Dkt. No. 78), shall proceed to a bench trial. This is based on plaintiff’s

18

counsel’s previous representations that the POBR issue would be tried before the judge (Dkt.

19

No. 108-1 Exh. A at 3:25–4:9). A subsequent order continuing the trial date erred in setting a

20

jury trial (Dkt. No. 100). This order corrects that mistake.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 22, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE