Hauschild v. City of Richmond et al

Filing 59


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 THOMAS HAUSCHILD, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 No. C 15-01556 WHA Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RICHMOND AND CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, ORDER RE DATES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS Defendants. / 16 17 Plaintiff Thomas Hauschild has filed a motion for partial summary judgment and noticed 18 a hearing for May 19, 2016. In response, defendants City of Richmond and Christopher 19 Magnus filed an administrative motion to continue the hearing date for plaintiff’s motion. The 20 reason given is that defendants plan on filing cross motions for summary judgment on the same 21 claims and it would be most efficient to conduct the hearing on the cross motions at the same 22 time. Furthermore, as fact discovery does not close for several weeks, defendants aver that they 23 have additional depositions scheduled which will provide evidence needed to oppose plaintiff’s 24 summary judgment motion and also to support their own summary judgment motion. 25 Specifically, defendants assert they will be deposing plaintiff, and this deposition testimony is 26 needed to rebut plaintiff’s declaration submitted with his summary judgment motion. 27 28 Good cause shown, defendants’ motion is GRANTED as follows. As stated in their filing, defendants shall file their summary judgment motion by MAY 19, noticed on the normal 1 35-day track, with a hearing set for EIGHT A.M. ON JUNE 23, 2016. Defendants’ opposition to 2 plaintiff’s summary judgment shall be due on JUNE 2. Plaintiff’s reply to defendants’ 3 opposition is due on JUNE 9. The hearing on plaintiff’s summary judgment motion shall also be 4 set for JUNE 23 AT EIGHT A.M. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: April 21, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?