Hauschild v. City of Richmond et al
Filing
59
ORDER RE DATES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS 56 .(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
THOMAS HAUSCHILD,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 15-01556 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF RICHMOND AND
CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS,
ORDER RE DATES FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTIONS
Defendants.
/
16
17
Plaintiff Thomas Hauschild has filed a motion for partial summary judgment and noticed
18
a hearing for May 19, 2016. In response, defendants City of Richmond and Christopher
19
Magnus filed an administrative motion to continue the hearing date for plaintiff’s motion. The
20
reason given is that defendants plan on filing cross motions for summary judgment on the same
21
claims and it would be most efficient to conduct the hearing on the cross motions at the same
22
time. Furthermore, as fact discovery does not close for several weeks, defendants aver that they
23
have additional depositions scheduled which will provide evidence needed to oppose plaintiff’s
24
summary judgment motion and also to support their own summary judgment motion.
25
Specifically, defendants assert they will be deposing plaintiff, and this deposition testimony is
26
needed to rebut plaintiff’s declaration submitted with his summary judgment motion.
27
28
Good cause shown, defendants’ motion is GRANTED as follows. As stated in their
filing, defendants shall file their summary judgment motion by MAY 19, noticed on the normal
1
35-day track, with a hearing set for EIGHT A.M. ON JUNE 23, 2016. Defendants’ opposition to
2
plaintiff’s summary judgment shall be due on JUNE 2. Plaintiff’s reply to defendants’
3
opposition is due on JUNE 9. The hearing on plaintiff’s summary judgment motion shall also be
4
set for JUNE 23 AT EIGHT A.M.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: April 21, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?