Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER GRANTING re 33 Stipulation Re: Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to First Amended Complaint filed by Gate Gourmet, Inc.. Signed by Chief Magistate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/24/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2015)

1 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
Mark D. Kemple (SBN 145219)
2 [e-mail]
Adil M. Khan (SBN 254039)
3 [e-mail]
Rachel G. Paul (SBN 300850)
4 [e-mail]
1840 Century Park East, 19th Floor
5 Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
6
7 Attorneys for Defendant
GATE GOURMET, INC.
8
MAYALL HURLEY
9 A Professional Corporation
2453 Grand Canal Boulevard
10 Stockton, California 95207
Telephone [phone]
11 Facsimile [phone]
WILLIAM J. GORHAM III
12 CA State Bar No. 151773
NICHOLAS J. SCARDIGLI
13 CA State Bar No. 249947
14 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANDREW ACHAL
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20 ANDREW ACHAL,
Plaintiff,

21
22 vs.

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01570-JCS
JOINT STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

23 GATE GOURMET, INC., and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
24
Defendants.
25

Judge:
Courtroom:

Joseph C. Spero
G – 15th Floor

26

Filed:
Removed:
Trial Date:

March 9, 2015 (State Court)
April 6, 2015
September 19, 2016

27
28

Case No. 3:15-cv-01570-JCS
Joint Stipulation
LA 132257621

1

Plaintiff Andrew Achal (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Gate Gourmet, Inc. (“Defendant” and

2 collectively, the “Parties”), having met and conferred, hereby stipulate as follows:
3

WHEREAS:

4

1.

On July 14, 2015, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part

5 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”), including Plaintiff’s
6 requests for punitive damages, and injunctive and declaratory relief (Dkt. No. 28);
7

2.

In doing so, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend certain portions of the FAC on or

8 before August 4, 2015, but Plaintiff opted not to amend the First Amended Complaint;
9

3.

Since the Court issued its order, the Parties have continued to exchange discovery and

10 participate in the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Program;
11

4.

Defendant has requested additional time to file an Answer to the First Amended

12 Complaint.
13

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that Defendant’s deadline

14 to file an Answer to the First Amended Complaint shall be extended to September 4, 2015.
15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16
17 DATED: August 20, 2015

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

18
19

By: /s/ Adil M. Khan

20
DATED: August 20, 2015

RT

27

By: /s/ Vladimir J. Kozina

seph C.

Judge Jo

ER

Spero

A

H

28

D
RDERE

R NIA

OO
IT IS S

NO

26

UNIT
ED

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

24 Dated: 8/24/15

S

23

MAYALL HURLEY

FO

22

LI

21

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

1
Case No. 3:15-cv-01570-JCS
Joint Stipulation

LA 132257621