Center for Food Safety et al v. Vilsack et al

Filing 66

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 65 Stipulation on Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule. Motion due by 1/20/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14

CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TOM VILSACK, et al.,
Defendants.

) Case No. 3:15-cv-1590-HSG
)
)
ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
)
)
)

15
16
17
18

PURSUANT TO STPIULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
The following schedule governs the production of the Administrative Record in this case:
Defendants’ production of the Administrative Record

On or before December
5, 2016

Plaintiffs’ motion to challenge the completeness of
the Administrative Record, if any

On or before January 20,
2017

19
20
21
22

Should Plaintiffs decide to file a motion to challenge the completeness of the Administrative

23

Record, Civil Local Rule 7 should govern the form, length, and timing of the motion, as well as

24

any opposition, and reply associated with that motion.

25

If there are no issues regarding the scope of the Administrative Record and no motion

26

practice regarding the scope of the Administrative Record is necessary, the following briefing

27

schedule will govern the cross-motions for summary judgment in this case:

28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01590-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment

On or before February
20, 2017

3

Defendants’ opposition and cross-motion for
summary judgment

On or before March 23,
2017

4

Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply

5

Defendants’ reply

On or before April 6,
2017
On or before April 20,
2017

1
2

6
7

For Defendants’ opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment, Defendants may

8

file a consolidated brief not to exceed fifty (50) pages. For Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply,

9

Plaintiffs may file a consolidated brief not to exceed forty (40) pages.

10

If Plaintiffs file a motion to challenge the completeness of the Administrative Record on

11

or before January 20, 2016, the above briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary judgment

12

will be suspended, and the parties shall submit a new briefing schedule for cross-motions for

13

summary judgment within seven days of the Court’s ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion challenging the

14

completeness of the Administrative Record.

15
16
17

Dated: November 3, 2016

_____________________________
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
U.S. District Court Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01590-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

2