Baez v. Muniz
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING 20 REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
GUMARO BAEZ,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
No. C 15-01722 WHA
v.
WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, Salinas
Valley State Prison,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST
FOR CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
14
Respondent.
/
15
16
On May 12, 2016, petitioner’s habeas petition was denied. (Order Denying Petition for
17
Writ of Habeas Corpus, Dkt. No. 17.) On May 26, 2016, petitioner filed a motion for a
18
certificate of appealability (Dkt. No. 20).
19
A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not “find
20
the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v.
21
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Petitioner may seek a certificate of appealability from the
22
United States Court of Appeals.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: June 1, 2016.
26
27
28
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?