Shaw v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 56

ORDER re Briefing on 42 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/23/2016. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SADIE S. SHAW,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Case No. 15-cv-01755-JD
ORDER RE BRIEFING ON MOTION
TO DISMISS

v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 42, 54

Defendants.
The Court is advised that an ADR Phone Conference is set for May 24, 2016. Dkt. No. 55.
The Court expects the parties to participate in that conference in good faith.
The Court denies Shaw’s request for a telephonic status conference. Dkt. No. 54. Shaw

14

should file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to

15

dismiss (Dkt. No. 42) on or before June 10, 2016. The response must comply in all respects with

16

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules of this district, and the Court’s

17

standing orders. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the action. See Fed.

18

R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a

19

defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”) If Shaw files a timely

20

response to the motion to dismiss, defendants may file a reply seven calendar days after that.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 23, 2016

23
24
25
26
27
28

JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge