Montoya v. FMS Investmet Corp.

Filing 38

ORDER DENYING 37 MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

MARLON MONTOYA, on behalf of
herself and all other similarly situated,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. C 15-01758 WHA

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
APPEAR BY TELEPHONE

v.
FMS INVESTMET CORP.,
Defendant.
/

16
17

Defense counsel have submitted a motion to appear by telephone at tomorrow’s case

18

management conference. Counsel state that they did not think they had to appear because the

19

parties provided notice that they have reached a settlement and defense counsel live in San

20

Diego. Good cause not shown, the motion is DENIED. Counsel must appear in person.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 18, 2015.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE