Perez et al v. John Muir Health

Filing 35

SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/29/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARLENE PEREZ, et al., Case No. 15-cv-01792-HSG Plaintiffs, 8 SCHEDULING ORDER v. 9 10 JOHN MUIR HEALTH, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 A case management conference was held on July 21, 2015. The Court directed the parties 14 to meet and confer to resolve outstanding scheduling issues. On July 28, 2015, the parties filed a 15 revised proposed schedule, on which they fully agree. Dkt. No. 34 at 11. In accordance with the 16 discussion at the case management conference and the parties’ stipulated schedule, the Court sets 17 the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 18 16-10: 19 20 21 22 23 24 Event Deadline to Amend Pleadings ENE Deadline Fact Discovery Cutoff Deadline to Exchange Initial Expert Reports Deadline to File Dispositive Motions Deadline to File Oppositions to Dispositive Motions Deadline to File Replies in Support of Dispositive Motions Deadline for Hearing on Dispositive Motion 25 26 27 28 Expert Discovery Cutoff Pretrial Conference Jury Trial Date September 18, 2015 December 15, 2015 February 5, 2016 February 12, 2016 February 23, 2016 March 15, 2016 March 25, 2016 April 7, 2016 2:00 p.m. April 22, 2016 June 28, 2016 3:00 p.m. July 11, 2016 8:30 a.m. / 10 days 1 2 3 4 5 6 The parties are directed to review and comply with this Court’s Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 29, 2015 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?