Perez et al v. John Muir Health
Filing
35
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/29/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARLENE PEREZ, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-01792-HSG
Plaintiffs,
8
SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
9
10
JOHN MUIR HEALTH, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
A case management conference was held on July 21, 2015. The Court directed the parties
14
to meet and confer to resolve outstanding scheduling issues. On July 28, 2015, the parties filed a
15
revised proposed schedule, on which they fully agree. Dkt. No. 34 at 11. In accordance with the
16
discussion at the case management conference and the parties’ stipulated schedule, the Court sets
17
the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule
18
16-10:
19
20
21
22
23
24
Event
Deadline to Amend Pleadings
ENE Deadline
Fact Discovery Cutoff
Deadline to Exchange Initial Expert Reports
Deadline to File Dispositive Motions
Deadline to File Oppositions to Dispositive Motions
Deadline to File Replies in Support of Dispositive Motions
Deadline for Hearing on Dispositive Motion
25
26
27
28
Expert Discovery Cutoff
Pretrial Conference
Jury Trial
Date
September 18, 2015
December 15, 2015
February 5, 2016
February 12, 2016
February 23, 2016
March 15, 2016
March 25, 2016
April 7, 2016
2:00 p.m.
April 22, 2016
June 28, 2016
3:00 p.m.
July 11, 2016
8:30 a.m. / 10 days
1
2
3
4
5
6
The parties are directed to review and comply with this Court’s Civil Pretrial and Trial
Standing Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 29, 2015
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?