Estate of Amilcar Perez Lopez et al v. Suhr et al
Filing
35
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 33 Stipulation to Continue Hearing re 29 MOTION to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ESTATE OF AMILCAR PEREZ
LOPEZ, by and through successors in
interest, JUAN PEREZ and
MARGARITA LOPEZ PEREZ;
JUAN PEREZ, individually;
MARGARITA LOPEZ PEREZ,
individually;
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CHIEF OF POLICE GREG SUHR; )
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
)
FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO
)
POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER )
CRAIG TIFFE (Badge No. 1312);
)
OFFICER ERIC REBOLI (Badge No. )
1651), and DOES 1 to 10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01846 HSG
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
MOTION TO DISMISS AND
CONTINUE ALL FILING
DEADLINES
25
26
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED:
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUE
ALL FILING DEADLINES; ORDER THEREON
1
Having considered the Stipulation of the parties to allow for the modifications
2
of the briefing schedule relating to Defendants Chief of Police Greg Suhr and City
3
and County of San Francisco’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended
4
Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6), and good
5
cause appearing, it is hereby ordered as follows:
6
Plaintiffs’ opposition will be due on December 10, 2015.
7
Defendants’ reply will be due on December 17, 2015.
8
Hearing on Defendants’ motion will be January 21, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.
9
10
11
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
12
13
14
15
Dated: November 10 , 2015
By:
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, JR.
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUE
ALL FILING DEADLINES; THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?