Estate of Amilcar Perez Lopez et al v. Suhr et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 33 Stipulation to Continue Hearing re 29 MOTION to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ESTATE OF AMILCAR PEREZ LOPEZ, by and through successors in interest, JUAN PEREZ and MARGARITA LOPEZ PEREZ; JUAN PEREZ, individually; MARGARITA LOPEZ PEREZ, individually; ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) CHIEF OF POLICE GREG SUHR; ) CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN ) FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO ) POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER ) CRAIG TIFFE (Badge No. 1312); ) OFFICER ERIC REBOLI (Badge No. ) 1651), and DOES 1 to 10, ) ) Defendants. ) ) CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01846 HSG ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUE ALL FILING DEADLINES 25 26 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED: 27 28 4 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUE ALL FILING DEADLINES; ORDER THEREON 1 Having considered the Stipulation of the parties to allow for the modifications 2 of the briefing schedule relating to Defendants Chief of Police Greg Suhr and City 3 and County of San Francisco’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended 4 Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6), and good 5 cause appearing, it is hereby ordered as follows: 6 Plaintiffs’ opposition will be due on December 10, 2015. 7 Defendants’ reply will be due on December 17, 2015. 8 Hearing on Defendants’ motion will be January 21, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. 9 10 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 13 14 15 Dated: November 10 , 2015 By: The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, JR. United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUE ALL FILING DEADLINES; THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?