Algazzali v. Colvin

Filing 16

ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/11/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ABULAZEZ MOHAMED ALGAZZALI, Case No. 15-cv-01847-MEJ Plaintiff, 5 ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD v. 6 7 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant. 8 9 As set forth in the Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions (Dkt. No. 10), this 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 matter will be deemed submitted for decision without oral argument based on the parties’ motions 12 for summary judgment and/or remand. In connection with their motions, the parties shall file 13 either a joint statement or separate statements of the Administrative Record, setting forth all 14 relevant medical evidence and written and oral testimony therein. Accordingly, the Court 15 ORDERS the parties to meet and confer within 21 days of service of Defendant’s answer for the 16 purpose of determining whether they are able to file a joint statement of the Administrative 17 Record, or whether it is necessary for the parties to file separate statements. 18 A. Joint Statement of the Administrative Record If the parties are able to agree on a joint statement of the Administrative Record, the 19 20 statement shall be signed by both parties and filed by the same deadline as Plaintiff’s motion for 21 summary judgment or for remand. Each fact, including all relevant medical evidence and written 22 and oral testimony, must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific 23 portion of the Administrative Record where the fact finds support. 24 B. 25 26 Separate Statements of the Administrative Record If the parties are unable to agree on a joint statement, they shall comply with the following requirements for separate statements of the Administrative Record. Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record 27 1. 28 At the time Plaintiff files the motion for summary judgment or for remand, Plaintiff must 1 also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting forth each fact 2 from the Administrative Record on which Plaintiff relies in support of the motion, including all 3 relevant medical evidence and written and oral testimony therein. Each fact must be set forth in a 4 separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where 5 the fact finds support. A failure to submit a separate statement in this form may constitute 6 grounds for denial of the motion. Defendant’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record 7 2. 8 At the time Defendant files the cross-motion for summary judgment or for remand, 9 Defendant must also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement, a correspondingly numbered 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Plaintiff and, 12 if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting 13 Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the Administrative Record on which 14 Defendant relies in support of the motion. Each additional fact must be set forth in a separately 15 numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact 16 finds support. 17 3. Reply Statement of Facts 18 If Defendant sets forth additional facts in the cross-motion, Plaintiff shall file a statement, 19 separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly numbered paragraphs indicating whether 20 Plaintiff disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Defendant and, if disputed, a reference to the 21 specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting Plaintiff’s position. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 Dated: May 11, 2015 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?