San Mateo County Harbor District v. M/V Spirit of Sacramento
Filing
56
ORDER FOR SALE OF VESSEL AND CREDIT BID. Signed by Judge James Donato on 1/22/2016. (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR
DISTRICT,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
ORDER FOR SALE OF VESSEL AND
CREDIT BID
M/V SPIRIT OF SACRAMENTO,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 15-cv-01902-JD
Defendant.
12
13
As requested by plaintiff San Mateo County Harbor District (Dkt. No. 38) and as
14
addressed by the Court’s prior order (Dkt. No. 54), the Court makes the following orders for the
15
defendant vessel M/V SPIRIT OF SACRAMENTO, Official No. 510560 (“Vessel”):
16
1.
The defendant Vessel shall be sold free of all mortgages, liens, and other
17
encumbrances in an admiralty execution sale pursuant to Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or
18
Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions (“Suppl. Rule”), Rule E(9)(a) and Local Admir.
19
L.R. 9-2. The proceeds of the sale shall be paid into Court to await disbursement upon further
20
order of the Court per Suppl. Rule E(9)(b). If the net proceeds of the defendant Vessel’s sale are
21
less than the Harbor District’s judgment in this case, the Harbor District will be allowed to seek
22
any deficiency against the Vessel’s owner, in personam.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
The sale shall commence at a time and place designated by the U.S. Marshal for the
Northern District of California.
3.
The Harbor District shall, pursuant to Admir. L.R. 9-2(a), cause proper notice of
the sale to be published before the date of the sale in The Recorder.
4.
1
The Court authorizes the Harbor District to arrange for other such advertising as
2
can be placed at a reasonable cost, and the expense of such advertisements will be reimbursable as
3
an expense of sale.
5.
4
5
The U.S. Marshal shall conduct the sale and shall abide by the terms of sale as set
forth in Admir. L.R. 9-2.
6.
6
Pursuant to Admir. L.R. 9-2(b), the Harbor District may credit bid for the Vessel at
7
the Marshal’s sale for any and all amounts up to the total judgment of $50,948.00. If the Harbor
8
District’s credit bid is the highest bid, the Harbor District shall not be required to make a cash
9
deposit or a subsequent cash payment into the Registry of the Court as is required for other bidders
under Admir. L.R. 9-2(a). The U.S. Marshal is authorized and directed to accept such credit bids
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
from the Harbor District at the sale of the defendant Vessel. If a sale to the Harbor District is
12
confirmed for an amount based only on a credit bid: (1) the Harbor District will be allowed to
13
pursue a deficiency action against the Vessel owner, in personam, for any outstanding amounts
14
still owed under its default judgment; (2) the Harbor District will be responsible to pay the fees,
15
costs, and commissions due to the U.S. Marshal for the arrest and sale of the defendant Vessel;
16
and (3) the Harbor District will be responsible to pay any other custodia legis fees or costs
17
applicable to the defendant Vessel.
7.
18
19
Court pursuant to Admir. L.R. 9-2(c).
8.
20
21
At the conclusion of the sale, the Marshal shall forthwith file a written report to the
The proceeds of the sale, if any, are to be deposited into the Court until further
order of the Court.
9.
22
Should no successful bid be received on the defendant Vessel, or if for any other
23
reason the sale of the defendant Vessel is not completed, then the parties shall report that to the
24
Court and the defendant Vessel shall remain under arrest pending further order of the Court.
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
2
1
10.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
There shall be no minimum bid set by the Marshal.
Dated: January 22, 2016
4
5
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?