Assef et al v. Does 1-10
Filing
15
ORDER CONTINUING CMC: Case Management Statement due by 11/12/2015. Case Management Conference set for 11/19/2015 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/23/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
MARC E. MAYER (SBN 190969), mem@msk.com
EMILY F. EVITT (SBN 261491), efe@msk.com
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
11377 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683
Telephone: (310) 312-2000
Facsimile: (310) 312-3100
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Nicholas Assef and Lincoln
Crowne & Company Pty Ltd
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
NICHOLAS ASSEF, an individual; and
LINCOLN CROWNE & COMPANY PTY
LTD, an Australian corporation,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
v.
CASE NO. C 15-01960 MEJ
[PROPOSED ORDER] RE CASE
MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND
RULE 26(F) REPORT SUBMITTED BY
PLAINTIFFS NICHOLAS ASSEF AND
LINCOLN CROWNE & COMPANY PTY
LTD
DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
6986354.1
28
CASE NO. C 15-01960 MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
It is hereby ordered as follows:
4
The Initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for July 30, 2015 at 10:00
5
a.m., shall be continued to November 19, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.
6
Plaintiffs shall have until November 2, 2015 to amend the Complaint.
7
Plaintiffs shall have until November 2, 2015 to serve the Complaint.
8
Plaintiffs shall file a supplemental Case Management Statement by November 12, 2015.
9
10
SO ORDERED
11
12
July 23
DATED: __________, 2015
______________________________
Honorable Maria Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
6986354.1
28
2
CASE NO. C 15-01960 MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?