Qurio Holdings, Inc. v. DirecTV , LLC

Filing 125

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 124 Stipulation of Dismissal. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
RICHARD F. MUNZINGER (Bar #217902)
[e-mail]
JOSEPH V. MAUCH (Bar #253693)
[e-mail]
One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Kirk Vander Leest, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
James P. Murphy, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
Rajendra A. Chiplunkar, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.
500 West Madison Street, 34th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60661
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
QURIO HOLDINGS, INC.

12

(additional counsel listed on signature page)

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16

QURIO HOLDINGS, INC.,
Case No. 3:15-cv-01986-HSG

17

Plaintiff and Counterclaim
defendant,

18
19
20
21

v.

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL

DIRECTV, LLC,
Defendant and
Counterclaim plaintiff.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01986-HSG

1

WHEREAS, Qurio Holdings, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Qurio”) commenced the present action

2

against Defendants, DIRECTV LLC (“DIRECTV”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.

3

7,787,904, 8,102,863 and 8,879,567, collectively hereinafter, the patents-in-suit; and DIRECTV

4

has denied any infringement of the patents-in-suit and has alleged that the patents-in-suit are

5

invalid.

6

WHEREAS the parties agree that this action should now be dismissed;

7

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree and stipulate as follows:

8

1.

9

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Parties jointly

stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action.

10

2.

Plaintiff Qurio’s dismissal will be with prejudice.

11

3.

Defendant DIRECTV’s dismissal will be without prejudice.

12

4.

Each party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

13

Accordingly, the Parties request that the Clerk of Court now close this case.

14

Each undersigned representative of the Parties certifies that he or she is fully authorized to

15

enter into and execute the terms and conditions of this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal.

16
17

Respectfully submitted

18
19

DATED: July 26, 2016

20
21
22
23
24

/s/ Kirk A. Vander Leest
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
RICHARD F. MUNZINGER (Bar #217902)
[e-mail]
JOSEPH V. MAUCH (Bar #253693)
[e-mail]
One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Kirk Vander Leest, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
James P. Murphy, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
Rajendra A. Chiplunkar, Esq. (Pro Hac
Vice)
McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.
500 West Madison Street, 34th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60661
Telephone: [phone]

25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01986-HSG

1

Facsimile: [phone]

2

Attorneys for Plaintiff
QURIO HOLDINGS, INC.

3
4
5

DATED: July 26, 2016

/s/ Joseph P. Reid
Joseph P. Reid, Bar No. 211082
[e-mail]
Thomas N. Millikan, Bar No. 234430
[e-mail]
Kevin J. Patariu, Bar No. 256755
[e-mail]
Michelle N. Berger, Bar No. 290721
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92130-2594
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 858.720.5799

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendant
DIRECTV, LLC

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

2

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01986-HSG

1
2

I, Kirk A. Vander Leest, the filer attest that concurrence from DIRECTV LLC’s outside
counsel in the filing of this document has been obtained.

3
/s/ Kirk A. Vander Leest
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
RICHARD F. MUNZINGER (Bar #217902)
[e-mail]
JOSEPH V. MAUCH (Bar #253693)
[e-mail]
One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8
9

Kirk Vander Leest, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
James P. Murphy, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
Rajendra A. Chiplunkar, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.
500 West Madison Street, 34th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60661
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
QURIO HOLDINGS, INC.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

3

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01986-HSG

1

ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause showing, the Court orders as follows:

3

1.

The action is dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

4

2.

Plaintiff Qurio’s dismissal is with prejudice; Defendant DIRECTV’S dismissal is
without prejudice.

5
6

3.

Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2016.

9
10
__________________________
Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

4

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01986-HSG