Ijecoma Esomonu v. Omnicare, Inc.
Filing
38
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 37 Stipulation to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Preliminary Approval. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Chad D. Bernard (State Bar No. 194162)
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
225 Broadway, 20th Floor
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 573-4900
Facsimile: (619) 573-4901
E-mail: BernardC@jacksonlewis.com
Scott P. Jang (State Bar No. 260191)
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
50 California Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 394-9400
Facsimile: (415) 394-9401
E-mail: scott.jang@jacksonlewis.com
Shaun Setareh (State Bar No. 204514)
SETAREH LAW GROUP
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Telephone: (310) 888-7771
Facsimile: (310) 888-0109
E-mail: shaun@setarehlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IJEOMA ESOMONU
Attorneys for Defendant
OMNICARE, INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
IJEOMA ESOMONU, on behalf of herself, all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
Case No. 3:15-cv-02003-HSG
ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE
TO FILE MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
v.
Action Filed: May 4, 2015
OMNICARE, INC., a Delaware corporation;
and DOES 1-10 inclusive,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 3:15-cv-02003-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL MOTION
ORDER
1
2
The Court, having considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Continue the
3
Deadline to File a Motion for Preliminary Approval (the “Stipulation”), and for
4
good cause shown, HEREBY ORDERS that:
5
The Stipulation is GRANTED.
6
7
8
9
The deadline to file a motion for preliminary approval is continued until June
13, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
May 24, 2016
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 3:15-cv-02003-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL MOTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?